44
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by TimeRonin@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The same company that started on CIA venture capital now runs ICE’s case management system, maps neighborhoods for raids, and pulls Medicaid data to find people to deport. The same venture capitalist who co-founded that company founded a think tank that writes the camping bans. His investment firm profits from the surveillance and detention companies that enforce them.

And the same investors—BlackRock, UBS, the Swiss National Bank—hold stock in both the software and the cells.

Palantir holds a $1 billion DHS blanket purchase agreement. Half of its $3.2 billion in contract obligations since 2024 came through no-bid deals. Its ELITE tool gives ICE a target list of 20 million people.

GEO Group and CoreCivic hold over 90% of ICE detainees. GEO’s 2025 net income was $120.1 million. CoreCivic’s was $116.5 million, up 70%. Both gained an additional $2 billion in profit.

In 2026 alone, ICE bought $3.2 billion in detention facilities from these companies—then let them keep operating the facilities. Congresswomen Jayapal and Randall wrote that the purchases “appear designed to evade state-level oversight.”

The same capital bets on both the software that tracks people and the cells that hold them. The same man—Joe Lonsdale—co-founded Palantir, founded the Cicero Institute, and invests in the defense and surveillance companies that profit from the laws he writes.

This isn’t coincidence. This is manufactured cruelty.

--ps some mod tried to claim this violates rule 2, I am the author, this is original content, I am the site owner, what you claim is a lie, nor could you have inferred legitimatley that it violated rule 2, which it does not.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2026
44 points (97.8% liked)

politics

31542 readers
2911 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS