1042
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 151 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I really hope one day people will look back at those practices the same way we look back at the normality of cigarettes being pushed on everyone back in the 50's.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

what about no. too many people are smoking today.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

i mean, why wouldnt they?

life sucks, society sucks, world sucks, who wouldnt want to check out faster.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 week ago

the same sucky life is even worse with heart disease, not that I don't sympathise with the desire to get out but that's a really dumb way to do it

[-] diablicja@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 week ago

One of my favourite people used to say "you gotta die from something" whenever the topic of his smoking would come up. Then he got a stroke that didn't kill him.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 99 points 1 week ago

Find me in my living room, reading aloud SQL injection attacks and AI jailbreak promps like the newsreader from Rome

[-] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago

Little Bobby DropTables has entered the chat.

[-] scholar@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

True Hacker SQL for True Hackers

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stein2027@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago

If these tvs are capturing private conversations for advertising, where’s the consent for that?

[-] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 57 points 1 week ago

EULA has T&C that the first users agree to when they fast forward with the accept accept accept accept screens

[-] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 45 points 1 week ago

Doesn't matter if you technically consent, that shit is still illegal (at least in the EU)

[-] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 29 points 1 week ago

Illegal only applies when the law is an enforced deterrence. If the fine is low enough, it's the price of doing business. If it's hard to sue or there's no enforcement, the law may as well not exist. Unfortunately, with these large companies it's been both: low fines and long lawsuits, so by the time they pay a fine, they have earned 100x the fine in a month or so

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Legality is pointless when the laws are not enforced.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Those things aren't legally valid for consumer electronics or software in many countries (possibly most of the World) because they're considered an attempt at forcing a change in the terms of the sale after the sale.

They would be totally valid if they're presented to the buyer for confirming acceptance during the purchase BEFORE they pay which, "curiously", they never are.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

They don't need consent, none do us can afford to sue them.

[-] 01011@monero.town 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Isn't that what class action law suits are for?

Or better yet, consumer protection laws?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

It's all in the EULA no one can opt out of, and no one reads, and they can change at any time.

You can blame companies who make hardware, but the laws on privacy are terrible.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 1 week ago

Samsung is the second Electronics maker I've started boycotted, after Sony.

Sony was all the way back since the Rootkit scandal, Samsung was about a decade ago when a small tablet I bough from them have filled with unremovable applications and after a few updates became pretty much unusable because it's didn't have enough memory (clearly planned obscolecence).

Patting myself on back (and a little gloating) aside, Samsung has been clearly abusive towards their customers for a while (it was maybe the second electronics make to enshittify, after Sony) and this is not at all surprising.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago

People should have been imprisoned over the Sony rootkit scandal.

For those who don't know - their music CDs had malware built in that automatically installed itself on PCs without prompting or notification that gave unsecured root access to any PC through a hidden service that couldn't be detected or disabled from within Windows. It was as bad as bad gets. There was no hidden EULA or anything. They just straight-up installed viruses on millions of PCs that opened the door for other malware to install itself at the root level where it couldn't be detected.

Sony should have been shut down entirely over it.

[-] lemmyng@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Wow. Yeah, fuck Sony. Seems they've always been in a race to the bottom. Now their insistance on a digital-only future makes so much more sense. They want to control any and all access to their products and don't want them changing hands IRL.

[-] tehBishop@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago

It's even a little worst than parent post makes it seem, it's worth a read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootkit_scandal

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago

Look AI code gets a ton of hate. And rightfully so. But you can use a coding agent to basically completely take control of hardware you own. It takes minutes.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 week ago

Could you go into more detail for those of us who don't want to brick their tv? I think you're over estimating some of our knowledge base.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

Was watching gamers nexus. Opened up codex. Gave it network permissions. It was able to fully take control of the TV in minutes. It even navigated to the admin panel and gave me the code to plug in. Very quickly had figured out some of the major API's. In a half hour, I was able to get a container/ program set up to just "send" any stream I wanted to the TV without having to use any Samsung services. Then, scramble/ poison telemetry data/ advertising data. Whatever you like. None of it is worth publishing. But I wanted to control the TV I bought. The one I own. In my house. That I paid for. And I think its royally fucked up the world we live in that there are any barriers to that.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Just don't use OpenAI or Anthropic cloud models for reverse engineering your TV's APIs. This guy got banned from OpenAI for doing this research on his Samsung TV, and there are reports of Anthropic models starting to refuse reverse engineering tasks, having been given new guidance. Apparently proles learning about the corporate surveillance they're under is a step too far.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Hence the point about not fucking advertising it.

[-] Town@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 week ago

I assume all your interactions with AI are being analyzed continuously and they will keep getting more restrictive about what you can use it for.

[-] belochka@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

They are saying that if you are using a cloud model, you are advertising it by default.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

There’s a repo with ready-made APKs for many TV models: https://github.com/Gathin23/cleanyourtv

And if your specific one isn’t supported, it has instructions how to do it with AI yourself

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ChaosMonkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

True, but it may also allow malevolent people to take control of hardware they do not own.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Well the malevolent people I'm concerned about are the ones who sold me a TV I can't control and who stole the Internet to make you rent our collective knowledge we built together.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

I just want a dumb TV at this point or an open source one that has great user control.

[-] Routhinator@startrek.website 12 points 1 week ago

Westinghouse and Magnavox TV brands both exist with dumb TV options, Max 32" though

The Westinghouse is unfortunately on Amazon, but I found the Magnavox at Canadian Tire for $200

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago

Imagine believing that they need "AI" to record us.

[-] monotremata@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago

These TVs don't incorporate enough power to do any kind of serious LLM. The "AI" they're referring to here is likely an embedded speech-to-text engine. And that probably is pretty necessary for this--it would take too much data to send actual recordings to Samsung, but text transcripts are tiny and easier to search and index. It's easy to forget, but reliable speech-to-text has been around less than 20 years, and the tiny ones that can run on embedded chips are even newer.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

They're using a classifier to capture metadata (like “does a dog live there?” or “does a baby live there”) by categorizing sounds. That's all technically legal, that's why they do it that way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Drink verification can!

[-] kaotic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

I don’t want a smart TV… my TV should just be a display.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

I'm happy with my $200 non-wifiable Insignia and hope it lasts a long time.

[-] Blibittyblah@futurology.today 13 points 1 week ago

Y’all think my 2017 is okay? 😬

[-] UntimedDiffusion@piefed.zip 28 points 1 week ago

It may not use ai but I'd be shocked if it wasn't still collecting

[-] Blibittyblah@futurology.today 11 points 1 week ago

It’s never been allowed internet access. I suppose it could be looking for open networks 😳

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GentlePulpy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

Google has been doing this for years, by the way

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2026
1042 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

89461 readers
3847 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS