Article doesn't load
It does if you register. Small news outlets got to be funded somehow.
“Why do people only read the headlines” 😭
Donations.
Please don't post links to this place again. Because people can't read it.
It literally only requires registration, not money. Deal with it
I delt with it by reporting to mods and down voting.
And also telling you about this problem. Please stop harming our communities by posting content that can't be read by everyone.
I don't regard a registration requirement from a very tiny source to be a problem.
Everybody can read it.
Jokes on you.
I voted for West in #1 and Harris #2. We got that rank choice voting
Decades of sterling reputation thrown in the garbage bin… Cornell, why? Ego? Blackmail?
yet another example of why we need ranked choice voting or some kind of preferential voting system where it's not possible to "split the vote"
Tankie splitter.
West stated that he believed the Russian invasion of Ukraine was "a criminal invasion, provoked by the expansion of NATO, which is an instrument of U.S. global power" and described the war as a "proxy war between the American Empire and the Russian Federation".[97][98]
West's campaign received extensive support from Republican and Trump allies to stay on the ballot in swing states in hope that he would take votes from Kamala Harris.[126][127][128] West expressed ambivalence about the support from Republicans.[126]
How much funding funneled from the Russians via conservative shadowy groups, too, I wonder?
So, Green MAGA. That was literally Jill Stein's strategy.
It does sound very similar.
Jill Stein's strategy was to stroke her ego and raise money to waste.
The Green Party may be a serious enterprise in other countries, but in the United States it mostly just serves as a punchline.
I could see if we were to put ranked choice in everywhere, then start trying to mount things like the Green Party.
But instead we have a goofy candidate show up on the presidential ballot every 4 years, some with strange foreign ties and Republicans funding them. Almost zero candidates at the local level.
And we can thank them for things like W and donnie.
" ...Cornel West on presidential ballots in 2024... "
From Wikipedia: Which needs to be updated with above information, provided link for added context. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornel_West_2024_presidential_campaign#Support_from_Republicans
Cool. Hopefully Musk fucks up and finances him again.
No shit.
No shit.
Instead, vote YES for maggoty cum!
I know this post isn't really a laughing matter, but I still love that username
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News