192
I don't even contribute it to wealth. I contribute religious sexual repression to it
Its sad that behavior like that is not disqualifying for Republican candidates.
So, bog standard Republican. They're all obsessed with children and their genitals.
Well shit--now he's a lock for the win! Nothing the GOP likes more than a pedo. I imagine they will be in lock-step defending the indefensible as usual. There's no low the Republicans won't sink to.
Throw him on the pile, 1,525 and counting...
You don't say
Not a drag queen.
Fascinated by this site's way of blocking non subscribers from reading. If you hit reading mode, once you get to the wall, the word are backwards and garbled. Usually the article just abruptly ends and it says the same thing the popup does.
elcihev gnisu gnisu eht eht .pots .dias redaer etalp ,otohp otohp raen puenil esnecil esnecil ni deifitnedi deifitnedi sih lrig s’revird revird sub gnieb seitirohtua sa sa a a ehT s’droffatS droffatS kcolF seitirohtuA
Why?
On topic, this guy isn't white enough to get Republicans to want to protect him.
Maybe those are the words in the article, but they use CSS to reverse the order of the letters?
I think they're backwards and alphabetized by paragraph? The words seem related to the content of the article.
He does inappropriate things with his willy, around kids, and likes Trump. He's a perfect example of a mam for Republicans, of course they'll protect him.
I think it depends on if he ruined his utility to them too early? And if he's convicted, of course.
I was about to post about exactly that. lol. It carries over to archive.today. lol.
Oh well, if I was less lazy, I'd block them in my DNS, but I'll remember to not bother reading them anymore.
Listen, I've already renamed the republican party to the rapist party... they still get to keep their stupid R next to their name, but with a much better fitting descriptive word. If its R, it's a given its a pedophile rapist pile of fuckin shit.
I was trying to come up with something witty but in reality all I can say is typical.
typical
That word has been ruined for me by The Front Fell Off. lol
Sooner or later we are going to get rid of pedophiles. I don't know what wormhole we travelled through where suddenly people are cool with it and open about it.
We have become TOO CIVIL.
WE ALL KNOW WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN TO PEDOPHILES
Diddlers flock together.
most expect, so on and so forth, put him in jail and bring on the next one
waitwaitwait don't bring on the next one yet, this one's not in jail yet, we gotta actually do that first :)
At this point i assume if he is good enough for them he is on it with them... The mutual destruction type of motivation... or at the very least one sided leverage thing...
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026
192 points (100.0% liked)
politics
31558 readers
2316 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS