The thing is: We really do know where a good place to store the waste is. It's in the Bavarian Forest near the Czech border. Where the Czech also want to store their waste. Solid granite mountains. Sparsely populated area. We could simply start drilling some test caves and be done with it in a few years. This is, however, not possible because of our regional bavarian party. So we have to do this dance and pretend to search in the whole country for the best spot, which will of course be this perfect spot in Bavaria.
To give a rough idea of how pathetic this nuclear idiosyncrasy is, here's are the numbers.
If article is correct, we're not talking about 300000 m³ of radioactive waste planned to be produced by 2050 by all industries (which are somehow already licensed to be stored).
We're talking about 27000 m³ (17000 tonnes in weight and 11 olympic swimming pools in comparison) of just heavy metal waste from nuclear fuel produced during 62 years (sixty fucking two fucking years!) of nuclear exploitation in Germany [source].

For comparison, every (fucking!) year Germany landfills (just landfills! it's 2% of generation!) at least 60000 tonnes of municipal waste, and... wait for it... 59140000 tonnes of waste in total (industrial, consrruction, municipal etc) [source, year 2024].
And yes, also those 300000 m³ (not per year, in total until 2050) less radioactive (but still radioactive) waste that has already been budgeted, from the first source.
It's mindboggling how humanity managed to find a source of such abundant, cheap, scalable and relatively clean energy... and then certain political entities demonized it and fucked it all up.
It's because this particular waste is both extremely poisonous and extremely long-lasting.
Not here to defend anything but natural thallium isotopes are just toxic without any half-life.
And in what concentration do they exist in nature?
Im talking about that a lot of never rotting stuff is buried the hole time without attention from a wider public. Thallium was just an example of stuff of similar toxicity as highly radioactive waste just without the radioactivity. But one could also name other heavy metals
It’s mindboggling how humanity managed to find a source of such abundant, cheap, scalable and relatively clean energy… and then certain political entities demonized it and fucked it all up.
In my lifetime I've seen 2 reactors blow up and at least one being fought over during a war. That does not sound safe at all
It's mindboggling how humanity managed to find a source of such abundant, cheap, scalable and relatively clean energy... and then certain political entities demonized it and fucked it all up.
Sounds like you talk about solar and wind energy in this paragraph, 'cause nuclear ain't cheap. Never was competitive, having nuclear energy was always about "we could build the bomb if we wanted to", that's why society paid for it.
Europe
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)