125
Fat lot of good it did them.
What turnoil? She's a sideshow.
This is just more confirmation that the right candidate won. Losing the primary and then supporting the republican is some scummy shit.
Fucking toddler throwing a tantrum vibe.
She definitely spat her pacifier and threw all her toys out of the stroller.
I think they're showing their true self. Would have another Fetterman.
Israel is paying her handsomely im sure
Honestly, the party should do her a favor. Permanently kick her from it.
Done.
I am a Democrat in Michigan and the first thing i am doing tomorrow morning is calling every goddamn number I can find and insist they kick Haley out of the fucking party.
She's a rat-fuck traitor.
We just dodged a potential Kyrsten Sinema.
She and her horse-faced fiance are mid-manic burndown of everything. She going full-on Bonnie and Clydesdale.
I'd say more of a discount Stephen Miller than horse.
Sure, but then I don't get to use the Bonnie and Clyde pun. :)
I can't argue with that logic.
Or a John Fetterman.
Absolutely. It was a tight race too. The monster just took its mask off.
Ummm. I guess you don't need to.
(Chair of the Michigan Democratic Party)
State party, good start.
I want to see the same statement from Jeffries. Take away her D label in congress. Take away her caucus vote, her committee seats. You can't allow treachery like this. It would be like a gang allowing undercover cops in their ranks.
Same, please share any numbers you find please. This is just disgusting on top of all her other BS
While I could come up with well reasoned arguments against Rogers, you really only need one: HE DOESN’T FUCKING LIVE IN MICHIGAN.
He can fuck off back to Florida where he belongs, and Stevens can go with him.
He is a real threat to the establishment. Unlike Mamdani, he was born here (*meaning, he can become president). He's actually a medical doctor, and he tells the truth. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmodf-lNGEE
This woman and her husband are evil. They want to subject this country to further fascist descent for a paycheck from their owners. Those same owners are in the epstein files and part of a broader circle of powerful perverts and slavers.
Stevens, Rogers, Trump, Thiel, Musk, Netanyahu, Barak, Wexler...all joined together. This is who we're dealing with.
When I read her campaign site, it was just a bunch of generic feel good happy bullshit without any specific stances or commitments. That's when I knew I was voting for El-Sayed in the primary. Glad I was able to see through her worthless bullshit. Go fuck yourself sideways, Hailey. I voted today and couldn't be happier to cast mine for El-Sayed.
More than appearing with, she's now given a full on Mike Rogers endorsement.
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/11/01/haley-stevens-endorses-mike-rogers-michigan-senate-01144698
This is the central philosophy of "centrism". Whenever you vote for a centrist, this is who you are voting for.
Centrists are santa claus - obvious bullshit meant to dupe children.
Sure as presents come from mom, every adult knows centrists are actually right wingers.
Remember to VOTE BLUE no matter WHO!
-Haley Stevens (D) who's CAMPAIGNING with Mike Rodgers (R)!
Can't tell if sarcasm...
Edit: WHY do you COMMENT like THIS? I was trying to understand if you were being sarcastic or not and your comment history is full of EMPHASIS via CAPS
It's a novelty account, so it's sarcasm.
If Satansmaggotycumfart is any indicator, then I never know when it's "novelty" or novelty...
It's said that if you say Satan's name three times in the mirror, they'll come out and mock you for your bad takes.
BigMacHole has kept the snark flowing freely for years at this point. I think.
Best to let it just wash over you rather than think about it
Edit: 7mo?? Must be a new instance, yeah?
I guess this is meant to cast Stevens as a generic avatar of "centrist"-death-mask-wearing conservatives who demand unconditional support from progressives if they win but won't give it back if they lose?
But I don't know if Stevens said or demanded that, so it's a bit confusing, and could also be read to attack the phrase "vote blue no matter who." Which is a turnoff since it mimics right-wing sarcastic comments meant to mock democratic voters who vote for "least evil" dem candidates over fascist right candidates - i.e., intended left turnout suppression. So seems like the novelty bit is getting in the way of actual, you know, communication.
Those were just some of my hilarious, important thoughts on the inherently funny topic of sober, lengthy deconstruction of comedy. (That was sarcasm, if such a thing can possibly work without all caps.) (That was also sarcasm. /s) (Despite the "/s," that last one wasn't sarcasm.) (Feeling good about this one.)
Yeah, I had to ask, because Stevens isn't the candidate you're voting for... So vote blue no matter who ™️/s doesn't quite hit because she got primary'd.
Which is WHY PEOPLE NEED TO VOTE IN THE PRIMARIES
Whoops, too many caps this time
No no, the caps made me understand your sarcasm!
Wait, no, sorry.
No NO, the CAPS made me understand your SARCASM!
Oh, that's better.
But I wasn't trying to be sarcastic. And neither were you! DAMN IT.
I have to say, as a very selfish European looking for entertainment (and outright ignoring the larger geopolitical effects), US politics keep not disappointing. The pettiness and self-sabotage is just... brilliant.
(From the outside. I'm very aware that it fucking sucks from the inside.)
Remember the day before the NYC mayoral election when Trump endorsed Andrew Como who was running as a spoiler candidate against Mamdani? I see similaries.
Good job Michigan for not letting Haley Stevens win the primary. We cannot afford another John Fetterman in the Senate.
Two faced cunt
Thats an insult to cunts. She lacks the depth and warmth
Sore losers gonna loser.
It doesn't help that Democrat leaders of the party have refused to endorse him
They work for AIPAC
She is a great real time example of why the Who part of voting Blue Matters. I'll won't support AIPAC shills like her. Her using Black voters as a prop for the endorsement was nasty work.
This is why the Separation of Church and State is so important.
Something is wrong in you. If an white supremacist like Tucker say I would never vote for Roger but a democrat would
She was a piece of shit before. This isn't surprising.
Told her primary campaign to fuck off on the isreali dick it rode in on when they spammed me for support.
What a piece of shit
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2026
125 points (96.3% liked)
politics
31727 readers
3788 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS