88

The charges centered on a $130,000 payment to adult film performer Stormy Daniels

A New York appeals court will be asked on Thursday to throw out Donald Trump's conviction on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The case made history in May 2024, when the verdict turned Trump into the first former, and now current, US president with a criminal conviction. The historic ruling did not stop him from returning to the White House, and it brought no punishment.

The charges centered on a $130,000 payment to adult film performer Stormy Daniels, made to obscure the money's true purpose.

Trump denies any wrongdoing, and has turned to state and federal courts in hopes of unwinding the verdict. He is not expected to attend Thursday's court session. The appeal turns on complex legal disputes, but the political overtones are hard to miss.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Asafum@lemmy.world 38 points 1 hour ago

34 felony counts

The historic ruling did not stop him from returning to the White House, and it brought no punishment.

The absolute joke that is "rule of law."

[-] slothrop@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 hour ago

Rape, pedophilia, genital obsession, treason, insurrection, pathological lying, cowardice....

"Right On"
-- maga

[-] yonderbarn@lazysoci.al 5 points 42 minutes ago

Don't forget a stated interest in committing incest with his daughter

[-] aramis87@fedia.io 5 points 18 minutes ago

The lack of punishment is ridiculous.

The ability to be elected to office even with felony convictions is a safeguard. If you were barred from office if you had a felony, then this government would just keep charging everyone it hated with felonies, hoping either for a conviction, the person to go bankrupt and give up, or create enough smoke that the potential constituents don't vote for them.

I mean, you know Ken Paxton would've had Talarico and O'Rourke up on charges, and enough Texans are Fox addicts that they'd have either eventually gotten a conviction for something or at least discouraged people from voting from them. And you know Trump would be relentlessly going after AOC, Omar, Sanders, Mamdani, etc.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 9 points 47 minutes ago* (last edited 26 minutes ago)

Founding Fathers- "do we add some clarity? Naahh that would never happen"

Quarter milennia later "Well now see here there ain't nothin on these books sayin we can't elect a felon rapist to the highest office"

[-] Asafum@lemmy.world 11 points 31 minutes ago

I get the whole being elected thing being ok, it's the no punishment thing that really pisses me off. Any one of us would have the book thrown at us...

There is something to be said about a tyrannical government charging people with felonies to prevent them from being eligible to be president, so as long as the people still vote for them I guess it's ok. But as far as the law goes, wtf is the point of a felony if there are no repercussions? I go to jail or face fines but Donnie two diapers doesn't because he's rich, famous, and has a cult?

[-] Arsecroft@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 27 minutes ago

i think you meant quarter milennia, as a quarter century is 25 years

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 1 points 25 minutes ago
[-] granch_bibblyfibble@piefed.social 1 points 20 minutes ago

"Quarter millennium"?

[-] Blibly@lemmy.world 12 points 1 hour ago

Bruh just commit sepuku on live tv already. You know you want to Donnie.

[-] danekrae@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Code of honor, him?

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 2 points 37 minutes ago

Bud Dwyer beat him to it, his ego won’t let him go second

[-] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 2 points 46 minutes ago

Yeah, but I don't think he can produce a time machine by EO.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2026
88 points (98.9% liked)

politics

31749 readers
4380 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS