Waahhhhh
Now Stephen King can finally move back home. /s
She voted to acquit Trump during his first impeachment. She was the final deciding vote. Fuck you, cunt.
She absolutely was not the deciding vote. That would have meant 66 other senators voted to remove him from office. The final votes on the 2 counts were 48 and 47 (with Romney voting in favor of removal from office of the abuse of power charge but not the obstruction of Congress charge).
Changing the outcome would have required 20 total Republicans to flip. Collins changing her vote would still have left them 18 votes shy.
He learned his lesson though.
It was the sternly-worded letters and emoji tweets that finally re-educated him
None of Trump's impeachments came close because conviction requires 67 votes in the Senate. His first impeachment only had 1 R vote to convict (Romney) - the total was 48, so they needed 19 more Republicans.
You're probably thinking of Collins being the deciding Yes vote for Brett Kavanaugh, which she was. Despite claiming that she didn't want to see Roe v. Wade overturned.
Just write someone a strongly worded letter and furrow your brow. That's worked for every other scenario for you, right, Suze?
Thanks for voting to put a rapist on the Supreme Court to take away women’s reproductive rights. Bye Felicia

I’ve saved this on for many years
She could never decide if her job was to lick federal boots or to represent the interests of her voters. As a GOP rep, we have plenty of examples that you can get away with doing either just fine, but not with constantly flopping between the two.
Oh, bullshit. Every time she went against Trump it was managed opposition. She only did it when MAGA knew they already had enough votes, and could let her preserve her "independent" image, and keep getting elected. It's extremely common in any vote, for both sides.
So spare me the whining about your sacrifice. It was all manipulation, and we all know it.
she believed he viewed Roe as "settled law" and "settled as a precedent of the court"
You got used and still pushed his policy.
You’re done.
She didn't get used. They always made sure there were plenty of yes votes to push through the Trump agenda whenever she said no. She never said no when her vote actually mattered. She was playing her constituents as fools.
You’re right. The people always get played.
She had zero problems giving Trump 93% of her voting support after voting to impeachment? Tell me that you voted just for appearances, without telling me you voted for just appearances.
Susan Collins, one of the token senators who was allowed to vote the other way when it almost always made no overall impact.
Get fucked.
Despite her whines, the reality is Collins only broke with Republicans when she was sure it would make no difference to the vote outcome. She made damn sure to toe the party line the rest of the time.
And she's wrong, sometimes it is enough: Voters have had enough of Susan Collins.
Exactly, if she could’ve gotten away without voting for Kavanaugh or the Big Beautiful Bill, she would’ve, but the Republicans and Trump needed her vote then, so she gave it to them. A Democrat wouldn’t have gone along with that shit. That’s why she got voted out.
She thought she had an eternal grift and was gonna ride that out til she died in office. I love this for her.
Expecting praise for doing the bare minimum - impeaching, convicting and removing from office a seditionist and a traitor to the country who was caught red handed committing election fraud, is frankly laughable.
You're not a child, Susan Collins. You don't get a gold star just for participating.
“I threw a glass of water into the raging forest fire I help ignite! Why won’t you acknowledge that?”
She didn't even do that she voted to throw a glass of water in an arranged brokered sham vote lol
Random breaks here and there don't count. You need to be consistent. You also don't get points for voting a certain way when:
a) It would have passed anyway without your vote
b) It never had a chance of passing even if you voted for it
Career politician grouchy she’s not untouchable.
Nothing to see here. Shes done.
I wish her the absolute worst. I hope she gets the elder care she voted for.
I doubt she will but that’s a beautiful sentiment
Honestly, her elder care has improved by no longer being a Senator. She could've gotten the Mitch treatment.
Oh boo hoo hoo Susie now GTFO!
Thanks for overturning rowe you old fart. Now scurry off back to your cave and die knowing history will remember you as the fucking moron who helped advance an agenda that set women's rights back decades.
Bitch, we know you only voted to convict because your party knew exactly what the vote would be and how many Senators they could have strategically vote for it without actually changing the outcome.
Scum.
I wonder if she learned her lesson lol
I hope that quote haunts her for the rest of her life
"It is never enough."
Correct, you betrayed the people to such a degree that it cannot be forgotten or made up for by any means. Kindly fuck off and wither in obscurity.
What a goddham ghoul she is.
“What bigger break could there be?” she asked.

What are we looking at here?
John McCain voting for healthcare IIRC?
LOL, give me a fucking break.
Bye Felicia.
"It's never enough". We agree on this, it's never enough until she also goes to prison for her corruption.
ha. hahahahahahahaha. haha. cunt.
die alone susan
Get fucked you crone.
You’re a terrible person Susan. Kick fucking rocks.
these little shits cannot be compromised orvnegotiated with. give them nothing but a noose.
These amoral ghouls really don't understand that the bare minimum isn't impressive.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News