115
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I'm starting to think "affordability" is just weasely shit for little administrative fixes.

I want to start hearing about massive trust busting and I want to hear talk about the income crisis and dismantling all the tools and methods that employers bring to bear to drive wages down.

In other words, I want to hear some language that is undeniably leftist about changing the structure of the economy, not bland phrases for tinkering around the edges.

[-] rafoix@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 minutes ago

Centrists only use that word because it polls well. They stole it from Mamdami even though they hate him.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 minutes ago

We have to get ahead and start actively making a case for socialism, or Republicans will keep having an edge in public debates.

[-] YourBestFriend@quokk.au 2 points 44 minutes ago
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

For those reading these threads where there's always a few doomer anti-hope comments: I urge you to call out and block these entirely unhelpful commenters. If you notice, those asking us to abandon hope, even though there is reason for it, do not pair any "criticism" with a call to action. In cases where that happens, that is helpful and not what I'm calling out. Regardless of why doomers are spreading gloom or what they think that will accomplish, paying them any attention can only ever lead to inaction, mental anguish, and helping fascist ideas gain traction across the world. Perhaps if enough of us block these users, they'll start to feel like their anti-hope messaging campaigns are futile.

Do NOT lose hope. For Americans: contact your state representatives, get active with progressive political organizations, and do everything you can to affect change.

[-] progressquest@reddthat.com 3 points 1 hour ago

Lol. Good luck with that.

[-] Fredselfish@sh.itjust.works 3 points 40 minutes ago

Exactly, but noticed how to two guys who want to lead the party only want to focus on affordability. With Trumps veto power it up hill battle. They definitely should still fight it. But if we don't address the accountability part that they do have the power to address. Then we have no rule of law and Trump and co, and those in the shadows will see that they can do whatever the hell they want without consequences.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 51 minutes ago

On the Accountability thing, I think there is a subtle thing to understand here. While Republicans had the majority during the last half of the Bide administration, dingbats like Jim Jordan were using the power of Congressional committees to investigate things that the Administratio did that they didn't like. There was no real legal basis for the investigations, other than some officials did things that hurt Conservative's fragile egos.

Those investigations has two goals: one was to demoralize Federal officials, but the other was to be able to turn around later and accuse the other side of wielding Government as a weapon when they are in power, because they understand it can motivate their side to vote.

We al need to understand that this is the real reason why some Democrats seem tepid on this accountability thing, it's because they think it might rile up the deplorables. But, I think it is important to note the key difference between now and prior Presidencies: the Trump administration constantly violates the law. All. The. Time.

I think if Democrats limit their investigations to obvious violates of the law over the past 2 years, they will have more than enough to look at. Simply asking why US citizens keep getting detained by ICE ought to lead to some ICE administrators going to jail, shouldn't it?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 29 minutes ago

As some have already pointed out, some of these things are very much linked.

If you get accountability for launching a war on Iran because donnie is a goddamned idiot that hates Obama so much, well, that is related to affordability. Gas/diesel shot way up as a result, and that impacts the price of everything.

Same for the accountability of donnie throwing tariffs on everything.

[-] rafoix@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 hour ago

Jeffries and Schumer only say affordability because Mamdami used it successfully of his winning mayoral campaign. Jeffries even used it to say that his meeting with the corrupt criminal Kushner had a meeting with him about affordability.

[-] echo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 hour ago

I don't know... that starts to look an awful lot like work.

[-] YourBestFriend@quokk.au 1 points 45 minutes ago

lol pick one. Fucking amerikkka

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
115 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31810 readers
5495 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS