173
Billionaires have class solidarity.
They have no class tho
When asked about it Donald said "I think he probably has an excuse for it" because he ALWAYS had a excuse when he cheated on 100% of his wives/mothers of his children.
Nobody covers each other's ass like the parasitic class.
Luigi all billionaires.
So this is Treason, right? Wouldn’t this count as a crime under ITAR as these chips are likely used for AI in military applications? Or is that a stretch?
So this is Treason, right?
In an Oligarchy? Treason is when you oppose the billionaires.
Hahahaha good point, or like what we call down south, the good ole boy system.
Isn't this exactly what GamerNexus had uncovered a while ago?
Apparently Nvidia’s most effective export control is controlling which government office gets to investigate its exports. A chip smuggling probe gets bounced between agencies while the CEO’s personal entanglements loom over it. At this point, the real national security vulnerability might be the revolving door.
I mean gamers nexus I am pretty sure covered this a year ago in their GPU black market video? And I don’t think that was breaking news from them it was just reported on because they were seen together regularly? So it’s not like people didn’t know. And we all saw them be buddy buddy, and we all know Trump loves corruption so I mean none of this is a surprise?
Echoes of Epstein to be sure.
You can break the laws for decades with the total support of the political class. But eat shit for one business cycle and they all turn on you like rabid dogs.
This story just gets wilder and wilder.
What are the odds Trump (of Epstein child trafficking fame) tried using this as leverage?
There was an article just yesterday about how Trump threatened an unnamed AI CEO that they should be very careful and think about their kids and wife...
Do not share your nachos with this guy.
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2026
173 points (99.4% liked)
politics
31821 readers
4069 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS