As a high school librarian, I agree with CPS here. Google's AI "search results" have imposed a new layer of difficulty in teaching research and critical thinking skills, while adding no benefit to those processes. I have several students who think LLM output must be accurate because it comes from an LLM, or that AI search summaries are a reliable source on their own - no need to click the included links to see if AI matches. The quality of student work suffers. I too would rather no Google than mandatory AI search.
Thank you... thank you heartfelt for the marvel... miracles you do...
And for the mature view on it...
Those students/people who believe AI is accurate should consider the actual algorithm and how works under the hood.
One of the main idea behind is the feedback system, and if any wrong bit comes from the feedback, it'll affect the whole set, and 0 may become 1, eventually.
Another issue is the following:
These conditions are ripe for "copyright laundering"-the use of multi-generational synthetic pipelines, an "AI Ouroboros," to render traditional proof of infringement impracticable.
This Article adapts the "fruit of the poisonous tree" (FOPT) principle to propose a novel AI FOPT standard: if a foundational AI model's training is adjudged infringing (either for unlawful sourcing or for non-transformative ingestion that fails fair-use), then subsequent AI models principally derived from the foundational model's outputs or distilled weights carry a rebuttable presumption of taint.
The burden then shifts to the downstream developers-those who control the evidence of provenance-to restore the evidentiary bargain by affirmatively demonstrating a verifiably independent and lawfully sourced lineage or a curative rebuild, without displacing fair-use analysis at the initial ingestion stage. Absent such proof, commercial deployment of tainted models and their outputs is actionable.
Source: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.02631 (Copyright Laundering Through the AI Ouroboros...)
Another issue is the dear dependence on vendors who control and supersize your use while you are subscribed, and while you regularly atrophy and become more and more dependent on some vendor, you pay more and more, realize and memorize less and less...
To the point you socialize less, your write less with your own hands, mind, and attitude, you create less, you live less...
google results are just ai summary and ads, they are not the undisputed best search engine as the were 20 years ago, plenty of decent choices nowadays
SearXNG is the greatest, it works way better than Google, it’s free and open source, and you can self-host your own instance for extra privacy if you want.
I'd say the only halfway decent choice is NoAI DDG, which is mostly just a bing proxy. StartPage was my goto for a long time but they implemented a proof of work captcha that adds like a whole minute of wait to my searches so. i gave up on them.
No, plenty of shit choices. Decent choices are limited and still shit.
Glad to see this. Hope Google falls from grace. They have been making their products and services worse over the years and only pander to share holders not customers.
The old maxim applies: if you aren't paying for the service you aren't the customer, you're the product being sold.
Damn, this makes me imagine an alternate world where google used ai to destroy their search monopoly and blew up the online advertising bubble
Fuck AI
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
Rules:
- Relevant posts only.
- No bigotry.
- No misinformation.
- No NSFW/NSFL content without being labeled NSFW or being in an appropriately-labeled spoiler tag.
- This isn't a place to talk about the cons and (supposed) pros of AI for different use cases. This is /c/fuck_ai .
- Especially no AI advocacy.
- No AI-generated content. If you want to post examples of AI failing hillariously, there are other communities for that like !ArtificialIgnorance@lemmy.ca .
- Venting is part of the purpose of this community, but don't aim frustration or accusations at other users.
- These rules are a living document that may change in the future.
You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.
Effective reports:
- "The third image is a well-known anti-semitic trope"
- "Claiming that 'agentic AI' can outperform humans at all jobs is misinformation"
Less effective reports:
- "Breaks rules"
- "Misinformation"