this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
163 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22083 readers
98 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Myzornis@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Probably too tired of cleaning up human shit from around the library. This is SF we're talking about. There's literally a poop map

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you think people who don't have access to a bathroom are going to stop shitting?

[–] fluffman86@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think they're saying that at all. Everybody poops. But obviously the library needs to lock up at night. Shutting down WiFi means fewer people will congregate, which means less poop outside.

Instead, the city should provide public wifi and public toilets elsewhere, or maybe additional portable toilets outside the library.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] blakerboy777@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the reasoning there? Are people without houses not allowed to use the wifi during the day? Is there something bad that happens if you use the internet without a house at night?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Catch42@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The problem unhoused people face is not nighttime library access it's housing. We all know that the reason they're shutting their wifi off at night is because while for some homeless people this wifi is a lifeline, for some others it's where they get their porn or where they hang out to do drugs and browse the internet. But the fundamental problem remains the same, because they have no where to go home to, whether someone is fapping or connecting with helpful resources, it's all done in public.

[–] gormster@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you think turning off the wifi is going to stop people from masturbating…

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I kind of took it the other way. If they think because I have a roof over my head I'm not watching porn and doing drugs, they would be very mistaken.

[–] Catch42@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

That's exactly how I meant it! Lots of people watch porn and do drugs, it's not a problem to watch porn in your own house. That's why I'm saying the problem is housing. The solution isn't allow people to watch porn and do drugs in public, it's housing so they can do it in private like normal people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ilikemoney@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

I guess the thought process is they wouldn't be as likely to make that area their permanent camp spot if they didn't have wifi access... Maybe....I dunno

[–] yankeebobo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ironic. Frisco has let a LOT slide in that city

[–] punkrocknoir@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But how are they going to look for jobs at night now?

[–] BaldProphet@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

They can do it at the library during the day, I guess.

[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Over/under on how many years out we are from the hunger games?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›