Asian American officials cite unfair scrutiny and lost jobs in China spy tensions (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

When Thomas Wong set foot in the United States Embassy in Beijing this summer for a new diplomatic posting, it was vindication after years of battling the State Department over a perceived intelligence threat — himself.

Diplomatic Security officers had informed him when he joined the foreign service more than a decade ago that they were banning him from working in China. In a letter, he said, they wrongly cited the vague potential for undue “foreign preference” and suggested he could be vulnerable to “foreign influence.”

Mr. Wong had become a U.S. diplomat thinking that China was where he could have the greatest impact. He had grown up in a Chinese-speaking household and studied in the country. And as a graduate of West Point who had done an Army tour in the Balkans, he thought he had experience that could prove valuable in navigating relations with the United States’ greatest military and economic rival.

As he looked into the ban, he discovered that other diplomats — including many Asian American ones — faced similar restrictions. Security officers never gave the exact reasons, and they made the decisions in secret based on information gathered during the initial security clearance process. Thousands of diplomats have been affected by restrictions over the years.

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] riskable@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago

I've been working in information security for many years now and this is standard practice all over the world. I'm sure the State Department is happy to have Asian Americans working for them. This is not that kind of discrimination.

It's a practical thing: It's basically impossible to tell if a person has a secret loyalty to another country. So how do you prevent spies from infiltrating your organization(s) from any given county? You take basic precautions like preventing people who have very direct ties to a country from working for you in that country. It's basically best practices because there's not much else you can do.

If I were a 2nd generation American Chinese citizen (e.g. my parents immigrated there) living in China and I applied to work for the Chinese embassy in the US do you really think the Chinese government would allow that? Hell no!

Would they let me work in Africa or other areas of Asia? Maybe! But the US would be a no-go zone for sure. There'd be no way the Chinese government would trust me not to have a secret loyalty to the US.

Not only that but if someone still has family living in a foreign country that's a big red flag as well. It can get you reassigned regardless of your ethnicity.

Let's say you've been working in the US embassy in China and your sister married a Chinese man who has family in China: You would would have to report that change in family status to the State Department (it's part of the rules). Then they'd make a determination as to whether or not you could keep working where you are.

[-] blaine@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago

Isn't this a pretty standard practice across the world? If someone has extensive ties to and/or sympathies for a specific regime, they'll be more susceptible to coercion and compromise by that regime. Why purposely put them in the place where they are most likely to be coerced and/or compromised?

You have to weigh the benefit (their familiarity with local perspectives and customs) against the cost (increased risk of counter-intel failures).

There's a reason Starfleet sends Captain Picard far away to the Romulan border when the Borg are attacking Earth. Or am I missing something?

[-] tastysnacks@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Doesn't sound like he had extensive ties or sympathies for the regime. Otherwise the security people could have said that. Their concerns were non specific. Basically, he's Chinese too which is a weak reason.

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024

81 points (97.6% liked)

News

39199 readers

2913 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world