334
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 65 points 3 years ago

This what happens when they were not charged with treason and instead given missionaries instead. They will just do it again.

[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 15 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

Yes. This is exactly something I recently indicated to some friends.

Every single one of those Jan. 6th people did what they did for ideological reasons. Them going to jail for like two months didn’t remove those reasons, it cemented them.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago

I actually heard someone say, “Murtun Lerther Kang hadduh go tuh jay-uhl fer what was right. Ay stote at uhlaykshun.”

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 42 points 3 years ago

While livestreaming on YouTube in the neighborhood, Taranto told followers that he was looking for “entrance points,” was going to find a way to the “tunnels underneath their houses” and wanted to get a “good angle on a shot,” according to court papers.

So the guy openly admitted that he was trying to access the Obamas' house and shoot someone. And all he gets is firearms charges. Our justice system is a joke.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 22 points 3 years ago

Sometimes they have to start with the easiest charges just to justify holding him, and they will add the charges that are harder to prove later.

Firearms charges in DC may not have to prove the intent to do anything. Simply having the LEOs testify to what they found might have been enough for charges.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 9 points 3 years ago

Fingers crossed this is the case here.

[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 37 points 3 years ago

The amazing thing is they don’t even know they’re fascist.

Most of them can't even spell fascist, let alone define it.

[-] notnotmike@programming.dev 19 points 3 years ago

intended to blow up his van at the National Institute of Standards and Technology

What on Earth? What's this guy got against NIST?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 3 years ago

BIG GUBMINT AIN'T GONNA TELL ME HOW LONG A FOOT IS!

[-] reverie@lemmy.world 13 points 3 years ago

I’M TIRED OF THE STANDARD REFERENCE JAR OF PEANUT BUTTER TURNING OUR SANDWICHES GAY

[-] subignition@kbin.social 5 points 3 years ago

Diabetes will ensure that their feet are shorter than regulation.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago

I bet he equates the Metric System with socialism, or some other nonsense like that

[-] Rootiest@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago

Goddamn libruls trying to make all the numbers woke!

Not in my merica!

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 years ago

Lack of metric system.

[-] donescobar@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago

And there are certain politicians calling these people patriots…

[-] keeb420@kbin.social 8 points 3 years ago

So Republicans are gonna lose their minds again like when the idiot got near the sc justices house, right? Right?

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago

If it weren't for double standards they wouldn't have any.

[-] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 years ago

I had just had a quick puff outside. Opened my phone when I can back in, and saw this:

Had a triple take moment of moderate confusion.

On firearm charges LMAO. You would think they would get something a little more serious than that.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
334 points (98.0% liked)

politics

31351 readers
3251 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS