this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
50 points (91.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7494 readers
463 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

Should either be illegal or taxed so heavily that any such action would result in a massive loss on each property owned by these ghouls.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And here I am like a sucker, moving in with my parents, so I can actually save some money and maybe, maybe buy one house of my own some day.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, but some day wall street will just own all the houses. It's a race!

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I am living Death Race 2000! It’s like I’m a movie star!

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We need to establish an owner-occupancy exemption to property taxes. Owner-occupants of 1-4 unit structures owe 50% of assessed property taxes, and are credited for the other 50%. Non-occupant owners pay the full tax rate.

Non-occupant landlords can avoid the taxes by issuing a land contract or private mortgage instead of a rental agreement. The "tenant" becomes the deed holder, and gains equity in the property.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that enough incentive for the landlord to do this? I think they would still rather rent it out and raise rent prices to account for the difference.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

Some certainly will raise rents, but at the margins, it will certainly have effects. It will definitely influence investor ROIs in the right directions: harming institutional investors, while benefitting local landowners and tenants.

The numbers I gave might not be the right ones. They might be far too much, or far too little to achieve the degree of market influence we need.