this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
395 points (97.1% liked)

News

23361 readers
3354 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 142 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

LOL, if you think that's bad, wait 'til you find out that the suburbs can't afford roads, either!

Car-dependency is a fiscal disaster on both the micro- and macro-scale, let alone everything else catastrophic about it.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 59 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It is also a disaster on an environmental scale, and not just due to emissions.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

For sure! I could write a novel about "everything else catastrophic about it" (and probably have by now, if you concatenate my previous Lemmy and Reddit comments on the subject), but that would distract from my point that the headline "Americans can no longer afford their cars" applies in more ways than one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] CoreOffset@lemm.ee 94 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Cars have always been relatively expensive to own and operate and the American way, unfortunately, has been to take out lines of credit in order to purchase vehicles they could just barely afford.

It's insane to think about but the average car payment for a new vehicle in 2023 was $726 and the average loan term is nearly 70 months!

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 70 points 10 months ago (18 children)

I've always lived by two rules when it comes to vehicles:

  1. Never buy new. Buy approximately two years old used low mileage

  2. If I can't afford the vehicle on a three year note, I can't afford the vehicle

Additionally, always secure third party financing and have it in your back pocket, but don't tell the dealership that part until absolutely necessary. They may try to match it, but their fine print has always had catches it in that make it a worse option in my experience.

I'm not sure if these rules will work going forward as prices seem to have doubled in the past three years, and I'm loathe to ponder how purchase is getting replaced by subscribe.

My current car is ten years old with 110k miles on it. I keep it super maintained because I can't stomach the thought of my next buying experience.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

As a young adult who wanted to avoid debt, my rules were somewhat similar

  1. Car must be used, for sale by private seller. Avoids dealership fees, warranty fees etc.

  2. If I cannot buy it in full, in cash that day, I cannot afford it.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

I bought my first car on credit. After my last payment, I diverted that money into dedicated savings for the next car. Kept me from lifestyle creep and paid myself interest instead of the bank.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

As a young adult in Europe (the place where walking and biking safely is possible), my rules were:

  1. Rent apartment close to work
  2. Don't need car and I still commute to work faster then my collegues

I am entirely convinced US cities are designed by the car lobby.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

The sweet spot for me was buying cars in roughly the 6 year rage. Specifically Toyotas and Hondas. My last car was an '06 Accord and it was a fantastic car. Affordable to buy, no bullshit, cheap to repair and required repairs rarely, drove great, solid interior. I would have kept driving it for another 5-10 years easy if I hadn't moved to a country/city where driving is totally unnecessary.

My buddy bought it off me and did some minor things to it and is still happily driving as his daily commuter right now.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Brand new cars in 1973 were like $2500 ($17000 in today’s dollar). No one wants to sell compacts in the US anymore because people love their giant SUVs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 89 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Stop buying suvs and trucks. Buy compacts and small sedans. As those markets erode it just makes everything worse.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 73 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (10 children)

I'm a multi tradesman and I run about in a 1.2L Korean shitbox with a trailer when I need it

Same tradesman in the US apparently needs a 6L V12 pick-up simply because of his micropenis? Yeah thanks for the pollution Brad/Chad/Tad whatever

[–] rhadamanth_nemes@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Don't look up "rolling coal".

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

He isn't a tradesman. He is either an office worker or unskilled labor.

The only practical use I have ever seen in my life for those oversized pickups is in South East Asia I rode on one that had been converted into van to go up and down this shit road into the mountains. Moving people. So unless you make a living loading up 8 people at a time to bring them up a terrifying grade mountainside you don't need a vehicle like that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 70 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Stop buying brand new Escalades and super F150s that you don’t really need.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I can barely afford the 2015 Subaru Crosstrek i bought back in July. Even 8 year old base model cars cost over $16,000 these days

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I'm not a real man unless I have two bank notes in the $80k-$100k range each.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Smacks@lemmy.world 67 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Couldn't buy a house, so now we have to rent. Now that we can't afford rent, might as well live out of a car. Now cars are too expensive, might as well live out of a cardboard box.

[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Owner Class: “Hey - it should trickle down any minute. I know you’ve been waiting 50 years for it, but it’s gonna come this time. Meanwhile, please subscribe to our Cardboard-Box-as-a-Service.”

EDIT: Oops, I just got back from my beating. My owners wanted me to add an additional addendum:

“Cardboard-Box-as-a-Service (CBaaS) has some additional benefits. Our free tier allows you access to the box, along with special promotions from our sponsors that will play inside the box. Parking comes as an extra service in order to comply with the law. We will provide details on what surcharges you can expect, but our partner providers can communicate what rental fees for land for the CBaaS entail.”

“Our Premium Tier will remove ads. And finally our Super Premium Tier includes a bidet. Water service for the bidet is included with up to 10 bidet cycles per user, with additional licensing available for additional fees. Water pressure may be throttled when many concurrent users are using their bidet. We will release new details on additional plans to increase your booty stream priority, once we figure out how much we can get away with.”

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am tempted to save this comment just to see how accurate it is in ten years.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spikederailed@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

"Yea, but the rents are outrageous" - Bender, Futurama

[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

Bezos just saw this post and cardboard box prices just tripled. Thanks a lot.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm impressed you sprung for the corrugated

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dingus182@endlesstalk.org 58 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Right. Cars aren't really on the market. These cramped, low visibility, shit-mileage behemoths are the reigning force on the market now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 49 points 10 months ago (3 children)

If we'd always been accounting for all the actual costs of cars, including externalities, most people would have never been able to afford them, we'd recognize them as the very costly luxeries they actually are, and not have completely dismantled our ability to live without them in every city except NYC, Boston, Chicago, DC, and San Francisco.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You could say that about everything. If you would account for all actual cost no one would fly, eat steaks, own 2 TVs or change phones every 2 years either. We would buy things that last 10-20 years and replace them only when they are broken. As we used to...

[–] Erismi14@midwest.social 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Slippery slope aside, I think reducing unnecessary consumerism would be beneficial for our most vuneral populations. There would be a lower barrier of entry into the economy and more resources would be available at a lower cost for people who cannot afford them

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 19 points 10 months ago

Oh, I wasn't making a slippery slope argument. I meant that this is what should happen. We exported most of the devastating impact on the environment and the terrible working conditions to developing countries so that we can enjoy tons of crap we don't really need. If things we buy would reflect the actual costs we would have to limit how much we consume. Of course no one would like it.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, it's a mixed bag. There have been absolutely incredible advances in efficiency that do enable a lot of things to genuinely be much cheaper and accessible than they used to be, but some of that is also just the ability to throw external costs on other people (climate change, for instance). This is why things like carbon taxes are so strongly supported by economists.

Steak, for instance, is hugely subsidized by how little farmers have to pay for water, along with other government benefits. Flying has environmental costs, but those are reasonably quantifiable and, per flight and per passenger, not that insane as far as I understand.

I do think consumer electronics are a bit of a different story though. Yes, cheap labor plays a huge role there, but those labor costs aren't completely divorced from reality; the fact of the matter is that east Asian labor is actually chap. Ocean shipping and modern production plants are insanely efficient, though again climate costs need to be captured.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But east Asian labour is cheap because of bad working conditions, weak workers' rights and no environmental protections.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cars actually make more sense in low density areas. Farmers need to get around. Urban areas should rely mostly on public transportation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

Americans can no longer afford ~~their cars~~

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 37 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

On the other hand, the world could have its first trillionaire within the decade!

And you know how like 1 billion seconds is 31.7 years...guess how many 1 trillion seconds is in years...

...you ready?A little under 31,690 years

But unlike Americans living in an unaffordable country, our future trillionaire earned it...right?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It's self inflicted. Americans don't buy inexpensive new cars. Now everything new is targeted at upper middle class and financing is expensive + pent up demand from COVID is exacerbating the issue pushing used buyers into the new market.

But you can still buy a Mitsubishi for under 20k and an Impreza for 22k. People don't.

[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Certified pre-owned lease returns! I’m on my second and they’ve both been great cars for $22k or under.

That said, a big contributor is the amount financed. When we’ve bought new cars we paid $7k up front for mine and $5k for my wife’s plus our trade ins. Many, if not most, people can’t afford to do that so they have huge monthly payments even before interest.

[–] Baines@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

22k for a used car seems like a bad deal

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Depends on how used, make, model, and trim. Not everyone is in a race to a bare bones compact.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

not to mention insurance costs and taxes

used vehicles cost nearly same in most cases and in poor condition

yes let us blame trucks not the $7.50 minimum wage and the inflation and what have yous

biden and electric vehicle are not the jesus of our times

going to take a lot to make travel affordable again and on that note the more traveling costs the less people do it and the less they travel the more stuck in the state they are at they become

way more than prohibitively expensive vehicles here this is a means to keep citizens in place and poor

[–] slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

yes let us blame trucks not the $7.50 minimum wage and the inflation and what have yous

¿Por qué no los dos?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

Y-….you guys used to be able to afford cars?

load more comments
view more: next ›