this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
229 points (96.0% liked)

Political Memes

5327 readers
2634 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

The wealth class tears up our roads, makes more use of our roads and other common infrastructure, and oh yeah, gains access to a pre-literate workforce despite wanting to starve all of it for tax breaks.

Progressive taxation simply means when you're a winner in society, you get to pay back the society that provided all of the conditions that facilitated your success in the first place. Wouldn't a sane person want to?

Instead they usually congratulate themselves, even upon inheritance, for having earned the exploited money in their portfolio with no help whatsoever.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 10 points 8 months ago

We just need to reframe the issue for them. The alternative to getting to pay it back isn't not having to pay it back. It's us coming to take it back.

[–] throwwyacc@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

I think the wealthy should pay higher taxes, and a flat tax rate is stupid But I don't think "the wealthy use more infrastructure" is a good argument to get there Arguably that use of infrastructure is to the benefit of all society right?

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

Let's make everyone's taxes 9-9-9. That's the same type of deal that works at pizza restaurants, so of course it'll be good for the country. Only the biggest brains can think of this, which coincidentally means I'm too smart for vaccines.

What do you mean I'm dead from covid? And my twitter corpse is still promoting the conservative policies that killed me?

Anyway, flat tax!

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

While I support this message, replacing the dialog in the third panel significantly undermines the original joke.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fair is a funny concept. Do we all stay with the same amount, end with the same amount, spend the same amount, or get the same amount of utility from it? All could be fair. There are likely angles I have not noticed.

Wages should be flat with all earning the same.

Houses should be flat, and housing should cost the same everywhere.

Services should be flat, and provide the same benefits to all.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

housing couldnt be flat because they arent equally located or built or maintained or sized or designed etc etc. oceanfront acreage couldn't be the same value as isolated crime-ridden desert lacking utilities.
wages couldnt be flat due to expertise, stress, responsibility, hazards, hours, location, etc.

[–] jmiller@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Plus if houses were flat they would be hard to go inside.

But I don't think Choice was actually proposing any of those thing could truly by flat in any equitable way, rather the opposite.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago

More C&H templates please :)

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Both is best. Flat tax for everyone, the wealthy have additional taxes.

[–] girl@sopuli.xyz 6 points 8 months ago

it’s effective at extremely long distances