this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
181 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2163 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 120 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I would still encourage the people of Alabama to be highly skeptical of any assurances made by these Republicans in the state. Their word is worthless.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 48 points 9 months ago

At a minimum, it's dependent on who's in office: if they have the info, someone else can come into office and charge you until the statute of limitations expire. And if they decide it's murder, the statute never expires.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Bold of you to think they can read.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 111 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Selectively enforcing laws is unjust and discriminatory. It's why it took so long to get gay marriage on the books. Pigs and prosecutors would only target poorer people and those who couldn't defend themselves and cherry pick cases unlikely to win on appeal.

This is being used so Alabama shitheels like Steve Marshall can persecute through prosecution all the people he doesn't like while letting his buddies off. All laws should apply to all people equally.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wish I could buy Fediverse Plutonium for this comment.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 5 points 9 months ago

Thanks :)

I liked the old reddit silver where it was that simply drawn medal.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

Also, if he doesn't prosecute anyone for it, then it nobody has standing to challenge it.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Wait, so fertilized eggs in a uterus are living beings with souls and should be protected all costs (up to executing women who seek abortions) yet eggs fertilized in a petri dish are just discardable medical waste? We're up to "God has to blow the breath of life right up a woman's vagina or else it doesn't count"?

As the saying goes, if it weren't for double standards Republicans wouldn't have any standards at all.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

God has to blow the breath of life right up a woman’s vagina ...

Good work if you can get it.

[–] growsomethinggood@reddthat.com 9 points 9 months ago

Safety tip, do not let anyone blow air up your vagina, even if they say they are God!! That's how you get a pulmonary embolism. Or immaculate conception.

[–] speck@kbin.social 13 points 9 months ago

Dang. God got it easy. I usually gotta be down there doing a whole lot more for a lot longer

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 32 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Even if he follows through on not prosecuting, there is always going to be a new Attorney General at some point who decides to prosecute.

He will totally prosecute though.

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago

Depends on skin color.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 29 points 9 months ago

Your Supreme Court says they're children, and you're pre-emptively saying you're not going to prosecute crimes against children? For shame.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

}set foxworthy -on

If yer Attorney General is saying “I swear I won’t enforce the law - it’s just too crazy!” . . . Yuh just might be a redneck

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter what he says now. He lacks the legal authority to grant pardons or indemnity or whatever. And prosecotors lie, especially for political gain.

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Florida and Georgia and I'm sure other states have already put forward legislation that can punish prosecutors for not prosecuting crimes. Really these are thin veils to give legal justification to remove prosecutors who are viewed as liberal. As I see it, removal of elected officials unilaterally is voter suppression and should not be allowed.

[–] TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The US constantly makes everything illegal, then picks and chooses what it wants to prosecute for whom and when. It means you're never safe. You can always be arrested or have your life ruined depending on the mood of the police, agents, and DA at various moments in time.

And these moods and choices vary greatly depending on your socioeconomic status and skin colour to name a couple things.

It's a disgusting practice. Write better laws if you don't mean it.

Yup, it's the Russian-era autocratic way. Nominally be a society of laws, but the laws are so rigid and unfair that everyone breaks them, which gives cover for political will to entirely decide who goes to jail.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 18 points 9 months ago

he's lying, we all know what. don't give the benefit of the doubt

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yea, but his fingers are crossed, so......

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh heck. I knew we should’ve made him pinky promise.

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

This mother lover would probably cross his toes.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

What a kind and benevolent overlord who won't punish his subjects this time.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago
[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

He's saving it for a rainy day when he needs leverage over someone dealing with infertility.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

When the laws have gotten so bad, the only sane option is to just not enforce them.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

when the laws have gotten so bad, that the a nutjob AG who's totally down for enforcing other forms of abortion bullshit; is saying it's too crazy to enforce.

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago

Pretty sure the ruling outlasts his tenure, next guy won't give the same slack.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

"unless they vote Democrat"

[–] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Ahhh, so it's not actually about protecting the lives of the unborn then? These embryos are not biologically different than the natural ones from a pregnancy, yet they get different treatment.

[–] rob64@startrek.website 3 points 9 months ago

Well, well, well. If it isn't the consequences of my actions...