this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
353 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2260 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 140 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Julia Ioffe, Washington correspondent for Puck News, said: “Imagine you’re sleeping over at a friend’s house and you get up in the middle of the night to pee and you hear a weird sound so you follow it to the kitchen, where your friend’s mom is drunk, crying, and rambling about the national debt. Those are the vibes from Katie Britt right now.”

Fucking amazing. So so accurate.

Watts said: “Senator Katie Britt says sexual assault is the worst thing that can happen to a woman while encouraging Americans to vote for a convicted sexual predator.”

Watts on point.

Republicans baffled by Katie Britt’s State of the Union response: ‘One of our biggest disasters’

So... did nobody review what she was going to say, or how she was going to say it, before they filmed it?

The scariest thing about this isn't even Britt's speech, it's that there must be a group of people around her who were totally on board with it. This is the message they wanted to send.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 52 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Like most cults (and Trump/conservative have become one).

Getting to positions of power is based solely on dedication to the cult. NOT competency at the job. It usually ensures the least qualified person is in charge.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It happens to ALL fundamentalist movements.

Partial list of organizations severely infected with or taken over by fundamentalist movements:

GOP

College Democrats

CCP

Catholic Church

Evangelical Protestants

Certain Muslim denominations

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 31 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I’m somewhat suspicious that there are huge swaths of the Republican Party that simply refuse to talk to each other or coordinate in any official capacity. Like, some of them are coordinating with the old guard, some are coordinating with Trump directly, some are coordinating with the national GOP, and some are just doing what they think Trump would want them to do.

All that said, it’s deeply disconcerting to see that their ramshackle organization still has a shitload of momentum simply due to the fact they’ve kinda converted into a cult.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Kinda? My dude, it is a cult.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I was going for ironic understatement lol

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The Q tards are some of the scariest people I've ever encountered.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 79 points 8 months ago (14 children)

Holy fuck - my girl goes from her kids & her kitchen table to graphic descriptions of sexual assault in like 0.2 seconds.

Give a fucking warning or some shit at least, you awful excuse for a “lawmaker”. Think of the “children” who you consistently use as an excuse to take actions against the LGBTQ community that cause them and their families to live in constant fear. Because those families don’t matter like yours, obviously.

Also, all the economic shit you bitch about - why people are poor and have no retirement - that’s on you and your friends’ watches. And to your “fellow moms” who struggle - lower the cost to childcare. Help single mothers. Make real maternity and paternity leave a thing. Lower the cost of healthcare.

Or just keep screaming into that camera like the fake POS you are. That’ll help.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago (10 children)

lower the cost to childcare. Help single mothers. Make real maternity and paternity leave a thing. Lower the cost of healthcare

After the tax cuts for the rich there's no money left for this. And who did those cuts? The previous president.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago

Not just the former guy. Trump, Bush, Reagan all gutted tax revenue by repeatedly handing tax breaks to the wealthy who neither needed nor deserved them.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 66 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

It's honestly so bad that it's actually getting it more views and it's being covered everywhere including the Daily Show. Part of me wonders if that's the intent but then I realize much of the GOP is completely incompetent.

Also, since the BoRDeR CriSiS is going to literally be the GOP's only attack this election cycle, let' remind them of a couple things:

  • Republicans blocked the border plan THEY originally wanted and which the Border Patrol themselves endorsed. <--- Republicans chose politics over policy.

  • iLlEGal ImMiGraNts actually commit less violent crime as a whole than American citizens themselves...

  • Right-Wing domestic extremists are far more violent.

  • Such undocumented immigrants yield a net-positive to our economy as a whole.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fuzzywombat@lemmy.world 53 points 8 months ago (7 children)

There is something extremely creepy about her tone of voice and body language. One second it feels like she is trying to convince you that she is genuine but she tries too hard which immediately make you think she is faking it. All of a sudden she sounds angry in a very serious way which makes me think she is a psychopath and she about to stab me in the neck with an ice pick. My immediate instinctive reaction is to stop the video. Last time I was this creeped out was watching Anthony Hopkins' performance in Silence of the Lamb. Of course that was just really good acting of a fictional character and this is a real life person which makes it even more disturbing.

[–] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

And through the whole thing she's using her submissive wife voice https://jesspiper.substack.com/p/the-fundie-baby-voice

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It sounded like she was out of breath and being held at gun point lmao. Fellas this is like the end game of don't stick your dick in crazy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

It legit looked like something Vaught made to defend Homelander in The Boys. It was laughably bad.

[–] crazyCat@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It was so disturbing I couldn’t physically make myself watch it, and I’m a news junkie obsessed with this crap.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

I had to turn it off halfway through. My kid was playing switch and said Daddy, what's she talking about? And I had to turn it off out of fear that he would take any of it at face value. I told him she was lying to try to get votes and turned it off.

[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 8 months ago

Show me your “There is no war in Ba Sing Se!” face.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

If only there was a bipartisan border bill which consists of nothing but concessions from democrats. Katie's one of the people who killed the bill.

Please. I beg you people, do not drink psycho moms sweet tea. There's something in that shit.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago

Katie is one of the people who helped WRITE the bill AND who helped kill the bill.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] n0m4n@lemmy.world 46 points 8 months ago (9 children)

The contrast of one of the greatest SOTU speeches in history to an utterly creepy call to gather a nut-fringe group to take over the Republican tent is a two piece diorama of what we are today. We are the UNITED States. I hope everyone spends some time thinking of what that means.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (10 children)

Any time a country has an adjective in its name that adjective is always wrong.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think we can give Northern Ireland a pass though

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 40 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The absolute terrible acting here will not be picked up by the South. That very reflective Jesus Cross around her neck is an obvious prop. All the fake crying in the world won't derail those people. Sickening.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Fortunately, there are only a handful of states that actually have a chance to alter the outcome and several of those states will have a lot of conservatives going "wtf was that?" Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin are the four I expect would see the most suppressed republican voter turnout from this train wreck of a speech

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I've lost all faith in conservatives to think logically or use common sense.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mvilain@fedia.io 39 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Didn't hear what she had to say but a friend said is was definitely going to be the basis of SNL's cold open this weekend.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Was that friend the person quoted in the article?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I mean it's sad but predictable when your sanest member still sounds like a lunatic because that's what the Republican party wants in their leaders.

However I do understand what she was going for in the whole kitchen aesthetic, you know trying to connect with the old boomers that have kitchens talking about their "Kitchen Table" issues.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

This is what happens when Republicans try to seem like they are down home people instead of corporate shills. The cracks in the mask show

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I had to watch that clip twice because I thought it was fake with the way she was speaking lol.

[–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Her manner of speaking reminds me of the sermons you get at 'modern'/nondenominational churches here in the south. Just the way phrases are timed, the intonation, the need to make every minute factual statement sound emotionally profound...

I have to wonder if she is consciously trying to speak in that way. I don't know why they would think that was a good approach for a political speech lmao. It's just so bizarre I can't actually process it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 27 points 8 months ago

Jesus Christ, are they cloning Stefanik?

This woman needs albuterol, STAT

[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That evil fake fucking smile...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tolstoshev@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (5 children)

What’s the opposite of a slam dunk called? Because this is it.

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago
[–] MossBear@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

That would be a dam slunk.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 17 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Remember, she only got the job because she's one of Trump's in-crowd. He'll try to distance himself from this flop but he owns it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

I'd never heard of this person until my wife suddenly started seeing so many pictures of her on Facebook that she asked me who it was... After I said I had no idea she proceeded to Google it and then told me her name... Which I promptly forgot.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What, are they saying that creepy dead-eyed stare and the overall Gilead vibes are a bad look for them?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 13 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Delivering the official State of the Union response can be a thankless task, as the former Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal and the Florida senator Marco Rubio, deliverers of previously panned speeches, would ruefully attest.

Nonetheless, the 42-year-old Alabama senator is a rising Republican star, widely respected on Capitol Hill and her selection to respond to Biden was a golden opportunity to introduce herself to the wider American electorate.

As a Gallup poll showed 57% of American voters think the US would be better off if more women were in elected office, Alyssa Farah Griffin, a Trump aide turned never-Trumper, said: “Senator Katie Britt is a very impressive person … I do not understand the decision to put her in a KITCHEN for one of the most important speeches she’s ever given.”

Among satirical responses, Tom Nichols, an anti-Trump conservative columnist, spoke for many when he said: “There is no way that this Katie Britt address does not end up as part of the Saturday Night Live cold open.”

With wavering voice, the senator described meeting a migrant woman who she said described being “sex trafficked by the cartels starting at the age of 12” and who, Britt said, spoke of being repeatedly raped “on a mattress in a shoebox of a room”.

Last month, Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, was ordered to pay $83.3m in a civil defamation case arising from a rape allegation a judge said was “substantially true”.


The original article contains 751 words, the summary contains 243 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yup, we had to stop it just a few minutes in when it appeared she was turning herself on over the rape story she mostly made up.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›