64
The religion of peace
noooooooo, that's islamophobia
Before I expanded the post to see the tagline, I was like "Wow, I didn't know those Anglicans were so zealous." ^^;;
Here it comes at last. Britain's policy about letting Islamic extremist leaders get educated, followers brainwashed and fester in their lands coming to bite the hand that feeds it. Good luck.
For anyone asking why I'm saying this if you bother to check about the Islamic extremist movements (who are supporting ISIS, Islamic Brotherhood and the type) and their leadership you'll find at least one who comes from England or English universities who studied Islam there. Other than the Egyptian cesspool of Al-Azhar University, Britain is the biggest provider of Islamic extremist leaders.
Anyone remember the Danish artist who were killed for drawing Muhammad? Islam is not a religion of peace. There needs to be reform in Islam and policing from Islamic leaders if we expect any progress from the religion into the modern age.
If you look into Christianity, westboro baptist church is viewed as absolute loons by most Christians. The Pope is generally spreading messages of peace and folding in new science and cultural changes to make the religion work.
Islam should be criticized and it shouldn't be considered taboo to do so. Of course don't be a fuckin racist needs to be said to make it clear since Islamphobia is the knee jerk reaction. We can have nuanced takes ya?
So are you arguing that groups like ISIS aren't seen as absolute loons by the majority of Muslims? Maybe you should be asking yourself why you homogenized the Muslims and not the Christians, despite both having plenty of violent radicals.
I would say ISIS is viewed as extreme by a majority of Muslims. When Al Qaeda doesn't want anything to do with them they are definitely more fringe. But then again I would say Al Qaeda is also extreme, just not as much when compared to ISIS. You might have some extremist Christians but it's much more tempered.
I do take time for introspective thoughts on this subject and I came to the conclusion that it's considered taboo to say anything negative on Muslims when talking on the subject of religion. I have plenty of criticism on Christianity as a whole but that path doesn't interest me due to how common it is to find agreement on the subject.
My opinion/thoughts. When comparing only Christian and Muslim religion, Muslim is more extreme and less criticized
isis were seen in a negitive way not because they were not good muslims but because they were rebels
everything they did was justified according to islam
paywall
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
64 points (83.3% liked)
World News
57903 readers
1841 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS