this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
899 points (98.0% liked)

Science Memes

11205 readers
2324 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One does not simply walk into Mordor. One has to build a spacecraft because even the eagles can't fly there.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] pythonoob@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

That's amazing. Such an effect on our cultural some authors have.

[–] SolarMech@slrpnk.net 5 points 8 months ago

Now I want to become a scientist so I can name something after a pun.

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

People are really awful at naming things.

Some German nerd thought it was cool while they discovered some new receptor so they called it "toll" (German for cool/awesome). Computer science is full of names that are kind of funny if you already know the particular area but are total gibberish if you're trying learn it. We're not even good at naming humans. The default is to either pick one of the names that's common in your culture. When people deviate from that you get a huge number of "special" names.

We need to put this in the hands of experts. I'm gonna propose a new field, "nameology". Those folks will do a bunch of research into names that make sense. How do we best name things so they completely and unambiguously label them in a way that's easy to remember and use? Then they can run around and give non stupid names to all the things.

[–] SpeakerToLampposts@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Hmm, I think we should start referring to the toll-like receptors as the awesome-ish receptors.
Another example: there's a fruit-fly gene named decapentaplegic (which has to do with forming the 15 imaginal discs during embryonic development). When they discovered another gene that interfered with it, but only when inherited from the mother, they named that one "mothers against decapentaplegic".

[–] Electric_Druid@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Last person just decided to make something up, huh?

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Par for the course, really. In each one of those instances, the same thing happened: the last one made shit up and it stuck.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›