this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

Murdered by Words

1527 readers
1 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] beerandfrankfurters@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

How does taking away benches not violate the ADA? Don't pregnant women, the elderly and disabled people need them?

[–] snacks@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

i dont disagree this is horrendous. In the UK Tescos put spikes outside their haymarket store windows for the same reasons. They dont want their customers or tourists to see people getting a free ride in their doorways in winter

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This has been reposted so many times over the years, did they ever end up replacing those benches?

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They were reinstalled days later after the backlash. Their spokesperson was spewing all kinds of BS. “The tweet was a mistake” “the benches were unsanitary” etc. I’m not sure if these are the same as the benches before before it looks like they’d be hard to lie down on anyway.

[–] ItsABarmcake@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep that's an anti homeless bench if I've ever seen one.

[–] Warfarin@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When it was never about the pregnant or elderly but virtue signalling

[–] Cybermass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you think virtue signalling means?

[–] Warfarin@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trying to show off you're a good character without actually meaning what you're saying

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm failing to see how that relates back to either the original post's photo or even the top of this comment chain.

[–] oneshibbyguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah... that's completely fucked. What world are we in right now, holy shit

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would appear to be modern America

[–] 4onTheFloor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Definitely an American thing. Can confirm. Am American and not proud of this shit. It's disgusting the way our homeless are treated.

[–] Warfarin@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then why not let them into your home?

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably because there are thousands of homes sitting empty with ridiculous price tags due to corporate landlords buying every available property and hiking prices by creating artificial scarcity?

Or we could invest in the social programs that prevent homelessness from happening to begin which will slowly reduce the homeless population in and of itself.

[–] Warfarin@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Go nuts, be the change.

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Suburban comments on how horrible this is, try living around the homeless. 90% are mentally ill and wont take help or goto a shelter. But they will piss and shit all over your property. Steal anything not bolted down and assault you on a whim.

But yeah I should be more compassionate from the same people that never have to deal w/ this issue. I would love to see how long the homeless would last in the more affluent community.