this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
48 points (94.4% liked)

Games

16800 readers
605 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] twistedtxb@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

PS4 and Switch? What year is this?!

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My guess is that they wanted to target the widest audience possible and with the PS5's backward compatibility they got to release it on the PS5 for "free".

(yes, they are missing the Xbox audience, but technically you could play the Xbox 360 version on Xbox One and Series)

They're also missing the huge PC market. I'd honestly be 100% happy if they just released it with an emulator packaged with it, just give me a convenient way to play on PC.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That's not what I wanted, I wanted RDR on PC 😟

Anyway, it's extremely weird that they chose to release it on PS4 with backward compatibility to PS5 🤔 (according to Rockstar)

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This gives me a little hope that we can at least emulate the PS4 version (~~using pcsx4~~). This can be done already with the PS3 version but the requirements are hefty and it's pretty clunky.

Edit: nm, pcsx4 is scammy and bad news.

[–] not_me_now@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I wanted RDR on PC 😟

RDR on the XBOX emulator is awesome!

[–] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The last time they re-released something it went so well..

Yeah, it's like they're speed-running ticking everyone off.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 5 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/t5Nwgd_T1-4

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] tiwenty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lmao no PC, too bad I don't really want to play such a game on Switch.

[–] OmegaMouse@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] tiwenty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Indeed, idk anything about the graphical capabilities of the PS3/X360 emulators tbh, so idk if the Switch can be similar to native PS3 🤷

[–] OmegaMouse@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

We'll have to see. Other PS3/360 games have been ported to the Switch with some success. If you can get PS3 or X360 emulators to run well on your system then that may be the best option. If not, Switch emulation is surprisingly good so hopefully this'll add one more viable way of emulating.

[–] digdilem@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Can't we have a new game instead please?

All I wanted was a mission pack for RDR2, or even a direct port of the original to PC with the frame rate cap removed.

This is almost worse than releasing nothing imo.