this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
-1 points (49.2% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6251 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 38 points 7 months ago (3 children)

This gets posted so often, and it's always so tone deaf.

I don't want Lemmy to become Reddit. I don't care if it gets huge. I'm content now. If it grows it grows, if it doesn't it doesn't. I left Reddit - why would I want it to become that here?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's a five day account, that basically became active an hour ago...

Probably the same person who just keeps making new accounts to say the same thing.

It happens weirdly often

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The technocrats want nothing more then to cast FUD on to federated platforms. Mastodon worked in their favor when it meant getting people away from right wing Twitter but no doubt they'd find a reason to turn on it later. Expect news reports about harmful misinformation spreading through federated sites.

I would be surprised if the establishment wasn't doing stuff like this.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (4 children)

FUD

Why are people using that as an acronym now?

Is it just a crypto thing that people keep trying to make common?

I dont agree with anything you're saying, I just want to know people keep trying to make FUD happen, it's not going to happen.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

FUD goes back to Microsoft during their embrace, extend, extinguish era. It was their game plan for killing open source.

[–] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

I had to look it up. FEAR UNCERTAINTY DOUBT for anyone else who is feeling out of the acronym loop.

[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago

I've seen the "FUD" acronym thrown around for a while to be honest, usually in the context of highlighting misinformation.

I don't follow the crypto community though - i'm guessing they use it a lot more there for some reason?

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've heard it used for a long time.

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

At least since the 80s, I think it comes from that Far Side "Cat Fud" cartoon

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 2 points 7 months ago

I think you're right... Probably why I recognize the name!

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 1 points 7 months ago

The federated nature means that instances and users can break away from other instances that turn toxic. The current structure is very centered around the home instance with federation being more of an SSO that uses the page of the home instance as a client.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Upvote for unpopular.

I like the vibe here. More users = more content, which would be nice. But more users = more assholes.

I watched cool niche subs on reddit get ruined over and over again as the reddit effect filtered assholes in and decent people out.

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

My feed is exclusively whatever has been posted in the past 6 hours. It's enough to keep me engaged for half an hour or so, then I go about my day. It's a pretty good sweet spot. The only thing I miss is the conversation on niche subjects, but even that allows me to return to the more old school method of finding specific sites for those niches. For example, I still keep up with what's happening in Brony circles by visiting www.fimfiction.net and www.equestriadaily.com as there is basically zero pony content on Lemmy.

[–] ghostface@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I agree with the vibe, here, I'm a R-refugee as well. I am.able to receive all of the news I was getting when I was lurking over there.

I'm starting to see mastodon pick up with more local media meaning we may get more content with less users.

Maybe we start a /c/wouldbenice for these feature requests. But more users doesn't equal better

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 11 points 7 months ago

Do we need it to? Who are we racing?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Does anyone know where it's at now?

[–] LemmyQuest@lemm.ee 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's a wrong way to view it. It doesn't have to reach 1 million active users on its own. The whole point of it being federated and using ActivityPub protocol is that it CAN be compatible with any other project that shares similar values. Lemmy is still very young and missing a lot of features, but the underlying protocol makes the data portable even if functionality is not built-in yet.

People also said Mastodon will be empty after the anger about Twitter will subside, but it managed to keep it ~1 million people after its peak of 1.8m. Fediverse should grow on its own pace and not be compared to for profit social media companies. Unlike for profit companies which need a big number of people to join for investors not to leave and keep investing to stay alive since they make 0 profit, Fediverse is self-sustaining.

[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I agree, so I downvote. Lemmy doesn't need a million users. Part of the appeal is that it's smaller and more intimate than the site which shall not be named.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The downside means fewer eyes on questions and less content on niece communities.

[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

True, though I'm not sure how important the presence of nieces is in the overall health of Lemmy.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 7 months ago

the presence of nieces

Well in some very specific and obscure communities centered around the issues of forbidden love situations of the familial type might benefit from it.

[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 months ago

I don't think Lemmy needs 1M users personally, it feels pretty cosy and manageable at the moment.

[–] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I think maybe in 5 years it could if the world doesn’t end before that.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 7 months ago
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 7 months ago

woah slow down this is unpopular opinion not boring opinion

[–] willya@lemmyf.uk 4 points 7 months ago
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 7 months ago

What do you think about ActivityPub?

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago

Not with void-heads like you trolling and clogging the place up with useless bait posts.

I hate to tell you this but we don't want you here and we don't necessarily want a million, please go away.