this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
118 points (90.4% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2568 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 115 points 1 year ago (6 children)

We have problems with: affordable housing, healthcare costs, college costs, a rampant threat of literal white extremist terrorism, a disappearing middle-class, and millions of children who go hungry every day.

This is the bullshit the conspiracy theory loving Republicans do instead of actually, you know, governing.

They have zero ideas, zero morals, and zero concept of hypocrisy. What a waste of time these 2 years in the republican run House has been.

[–] Zalack@startrek.website 37 points 1 year ago

This is mostly about normalizing "impeachment" so that Trump's two impeachments don't look as bad. This is a classic Republican tactic: when your guy gets caught doing "thing" start slinging "thing" around at your enemies until it loses all meaning.

Similar tactic to co-opting "fake news", "woke", "feminism", and "critical race theory". All were terms that threatened to undermine the conservative ideology, and so were quickly hurled around as insults until their original meaning was completely distorted.

[–] SevFTW@feddit.de 32 points 1 year ago

Not just republicans, conservatives world wide have no relevant policies and have to resort to populist fear mongering to stay relevant. Look at England, Canada, Germany, Italy and RuZZia, they have nothing to offer but discrimination and ostracism.

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Power and control is all the global Right wing want, the sooner we accept and understand that the better off we'll be when dealing with them.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

I'm wildly in favor of anything Republicans do that's a waste of time, because most of what they do is so much worse than that.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Make sure to register future voters for the next elections.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Republicans actually want people to suffer. They love it, it shows that they're winning. The more misery in the world, the closer it is to their ideal.

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

    "The evidence continues to mount by the day," Steube said without providing details about the evidence he was citing.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What is the evidence? Let's look, and there isn't any. Everything in this is based on fake news and MAGA talking points. There isn't anything in this that occurred.

[–] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Evidence!?! Well number ONE he has a LAPTOP, honey and number TWO his name is BIDEN!

What more EVIDENCE do you NEED, honey?

[–] justastranger@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only evidence they need is the fact that he's a Democrat and therefore must be evil by the conservative categorical hierarchical construct

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Isn't even any evidence of the laptop part.

[–] McNasty@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I would say the evidence available suggests that I would not want Hunter Biden in a position of power in my government. Good thing he's not.

The plea bargain is its own thing, first offenders generally get a pass unless they've done something heinous.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republicans are really trying hard to lose the next election.

[–] atticus88th@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Not to be a bummer but their base eats this shit up for breakfast then turns out to vote even harder once it gets shot down.

[–] Dankry@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, yeah, yeah, “must get even for impeaching Trump twice.” 🙄

Republicans are like toddlers going from one temper tantrum to the next and it’s exhausting.

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"The Biden Crime Family has personally profited of Joe's government positions through bribery, threats, and fraud. Joe Biden must not be allowed to continue to sit in the White House, selling out our country," Steube continued.

Ironic that's essentially everything Donnie has actually been indicted for

[–] Dankry@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Yep, Republicans are projecting on more screens than the Barbie movie with that utter nonsense.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They haven't yet been indicted for the obstruction of justice during the Muller investigation - that was the one where the whole family was involved.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and it’s exhausting.

That's the point. They just fling shit until you're overwhelmed and exhausted dealing with it all that you can't properly do anything else.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

"Debating Republicans on anything is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon; it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory."

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Joe is guilty of being Biden, which is clearly an impeachable offense as described in the ConStiTUtioN

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty sure someone already did this and the Republicans killed it by referring to committee. Because they don't want anyone in an even slightly purple seat to have to vote on this.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I think the majority of them don't want this to get to a vote. They're in a shitty situation where they have to convince moderate and independent voters that they're not extremists or super far right -- but they also need to satisfy their extremist base or they're getting primaried out as a RINO in the swamp. Republican leadership keeps trying to carefully thread that needle, and the extremist wing constantly gets in their way of doing so.

[–] hihusio@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

hunter biden eh? but yet total silence on jared kushner

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 year ago

They really want a Harris presidency, don't they? It's past the midterms, if they hurry up, she could get 9 years in!

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like he's hoping he can use the word "Biden" over and over, describing every infraction of Hunter and hope the Senate and American people are too dumb to know he's not actually talking about the President.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kind of like when they attacked Obama for his policies in Libya, threatening to impeach him, threatening to defund operations, then going "Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!" completely forgetting they were totally opposed to doing ANYTHING in Libya and that, yeah, Benghazi is, in fact, in Libya.

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

And that Bush is the reason there wasn't enough security in the first place.

[–] Vlhacs@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Impeach their guy one time, and they respond with so much bad faith BS. This is child like behavior

[–] rifugee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Vlhacs@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Sorry, a couple times

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Boebert and MTG inconsolable

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

ROFL…. k.

[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Wait, wasn't the thing they're accusing Hunter of, the whole "selling access" thing something that happened years ago before Biden was ever President?