this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
210 points (95.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2248 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former TikTok senior data scientist:

“I literally worked on a project that gave U.S. data to China”

“They were completely complicit in that. There were Americans that were working in upper management that were completely complicit in this.”

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is this where we post the shocked Pikachu face? Or do they only accept Pooh bear memes?

[–] MichaelTen@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

As an American, I would be appalled if my data were provided to the Chinese government for anything less than Meta charges to provide that info. It’s just unfair to TikTok and I believe in a free market in commoditizing the lives of human beings.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 7 months ago

Having raw, fined grained telemetry about virtually every action you take and that can be upgraded to collect more details at will with a new app version push is way, way different than being able to say “show this ad to people in ZIP code 12345”

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Ok, fine. I concede the point. Replace Meta with 50 data brokers that sell “anonymized” location data on everyone who ever downloaded a free app.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

If only anyone could have known

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No one is fighting for tiktok thinking it didn't share info with China. The problem is China can just buy our data from a number of data brokers. Every social media, shopping, and US website collects your info to be sold. That's the problem. The singled out tiktok bc China was collecting it free and people are learning how corrupt our US government is.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It’s more than “your data”, it’s the use of the platform to amplify/disseminate propaganda.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Welcome to every social media platform out there. Meta has done experiments on teens and helped genocides. Twitter/X is filled with Nazis and white nationalist. Truth social.... enough said. Reddit had women abusive subreddits and child porn leaks. Those are a few examples of other platforms.

That is the problem, all of them are the same and should be under heavy regulation since they give access to children and our data. Twitter providing the Saudi government with users tweets which ends with them being arrested seems like a "your data" issue.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean Christ even niche chan boards were heavily targeted by the alt right turning frothing shit cauldrons into .... more frothy racist shit cauldrons?

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 months ago

Shit, I forgot the chan boards. They had literally child p*rn and it took forever to banned.

[–] MichaelTen@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No one could have predicted this. (Satire)

I see Chinese in on tiktok semi regularly at least it seems.

Did the ceo lie to usa congress under oath?

Limitless Peace

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely the CEO lied, but unfortunately our government lacks the teeth to put him in jail.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

I wonder how this plays out if he lied under oath tbh.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Sooo... no different than Google working with the US government, then.

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 2 points 7 months ago

Clearly false - Google is banned in China.

[–] ZK686@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Um, the difference is China is our #1 enemy?

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

I thought that was Iran? Sorry, I have trouble keeping up with the whole "enemy-of-the-week" thing.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago
[–] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Anyway, let's say this is true. What can China do with this data?

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Doyee

NSA just mad they don't get to plug their dedicated spyware directly into it.

That's why they want it to become US owned.