this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
61 points (93.0% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3198 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Does anyone think that there'll ever be a simple EV car produced for market without all the extra junk found in most electric cars? Why or why not?

I don't see the need for the infotainment dash, personal data tracking, self-driving, lack of physical buttons, and lack or reparability.

Wouldn't it be nice to have an EV that is probably cheaper without all that forced extra stuff? Can't we just have a simple EV that has an electric engine that is reliable, cheaper, and doesn't have a need for constant software updates? Maybe you can work on it in your garage for the most part for simple maintenance.

I'd really like to have an EV one day but seems like they are all super expensive, have no sense of ownership like typical cars, are constantly tracking you, and are trying to shove extra features down your throat.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Steve@communick.news 31 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Most of what you're talking about is put in ICE cars now also.

I just don't want my car listening to my conversations and tracking where I'm going. That would be nice.

[–] GeneralDingus@lemmy.cafe 5 points 7 months ago

Very true. I haven't been looking at the ICE market mostly because I drive an old car and probably will until it breaks. But that's also very frustrating.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

infotainment dash

Cars in the US are required to have rear-facing cameras. There's going to be a screen for that. It makes sense to incorporate some things into that screen, because that's what people expect now. Android Auto/Car Play for sure. Doesn't have to be a touchscreen; Mazda does that right with a center console knob and buttons.

OTA software updates are a good thing, to be able to address service issues without having to go to a dealership. Previously, car computer updates had to be done with a USB stick.

electric engine that is reliable

Electric motors are super reliable and hardly ever need servicing. Batteries are getting better, but as of right now, you have to replace the entire battery pack, at great cost. I'd love to see a more modular battery configuration with replaceable cells.

self-driving

Adaptive cruise control is a game changer in every way. It makes driving so much safer. The radar is already there, might as well using it for lane departure and steering assist.

[–] You999@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Seriously where did they get that electric motors aren't reliable? The same motor technology has been powering diesel-electric locomotives for nearly a hundred years and those traction motors really rack up the miles...

[–] ____@infosec.pub 3 points 7 months ago

Not to mention that the basic underlying premise of an electric motor is dead simple in comparison to an ICE.

Sure, it gets more complex the more you scale it up, etc. But at the end of the day, an eight year old can build an approximation of a motor.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 7 points 7 months ago

Assisted driving is now evaluated as a safety feature by the certifications agency.

So unfortunately not adding adaptive cruise control, crash detection and all that would means degrading the safety rating of the car and no manufacturer would do that.

[–] GeneralDingus@lemmy.cafe 6 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Just to clarify, I didn't mean that electric engines weren't reliable. It was more of a combination of things I'd like to see in an EV. And I'm all down for all those other features too! I just would like a barebones option for us poors, you know? You can have different tiered options, and maybe getting rid of all the extra features can make for a reliable cheaper car. And in a barebones model, why would you need constant OS updates? Just have the engine tuned like other things in a car like electric fuel injection. Everything else should be like clockwork.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 10 points 7 months ago

Oh, I agree. I think the electric car market is way too "tech heavy," certainly for my liking, but I also think that at present, reducing the amount of fiddly tech stuff wouldn't reduce the price of the vehicle by very much. "Well, if I just pay a little bit more, I get a whole lot more."

The battery is what costs. And people who are going to buy a cheap electric car are going to be people for whom that is their only car, so it needs to do a lot of things, including going on long trips, which means having a long range. A 100-mile range commuter car would be perfect for a whole lot of people, except for that one time they might want to go on a vacation in it, or load it up with luggage and take three or four people to the airport.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I use a Gen 1 Nissan Leaf as a commuter car that I got for $9k. The average sales price for a new vehicle in general is around $40k these days. Get a used Chevy Bolt would be my recommendation, better range than the Leaf, CCS charging, and the price is probably around $12-14k.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago

OTA software updates are a good thing, to be able to address service issues without having to go to a dealership. Previously, car computer updates had to be done with a USB stick.

Which I would vastly prefer over someone bricking my car remotely because some intern fat-fingered a command.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I agree, I want the dumbest ev possible. I'm a software dev and the last thing I want is a touch screen attached to a car you can't replace plus a battery you can't replace.

[–] GeneralDingus@lemmy.cafe 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Touch screens are less intuitive and more distracting than simple buttons that you can use without taking your eyes off the road. And yes! Batteries degrade pretty quickly, I hear around 4 years! If a new battery costs the same of a brand new car then it doesn't make sense to buy EVs from a financial point of view.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Batteries do not degrade that quickly. Huge myth perpetrated by people who want the ice industry to keep running. For real proof of this you can look at the energy storage companies who are taking old batteries from Nissan leafs and Priuses from the early 2010s and see what that company rates the battery degradation at. It’s usually around 88-89%. That means in 10-14 years the battery has only degraded 10 percent. And that was old battery tech. It’s only gotten better since then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 4 points 7 months ago

Batteries degrade pretty quickly, I hear around 4 years!

My car is 5 years old now and battery capacity is at 93% of original.

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The conversion kit market might meet this desire a bit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iluminae@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I was excited for this car that was all about simplicity and recyclability, sacrificing speed and features: https://www.citroen.co.uk/about-citroen/concept-cars/citroen-oli.html

But of course, they will never actually make and sell it :(

[–] GeneralDingus@lemmy.cafe 3 points 7 months ago

This seems like its exactly on point to what I was hoping for. I really hope this is something that takes off in the EV industry!

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Seconded!!

Just enough computing power to handle braking regeneration, and charging.

I’ve driven for (Cough) years, I’m good. I’ll use Waze or something if I need help.

I don’t need 8 billion sensors thanks.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You don't need much computing power to control an EV. See all the electric scooters with absurdly dumb electronics. You just need to scale it up and use hardware matching the needs of a car. The logic can stay the exact same.

[–] GeneralDingus@lemmy.cafe 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

The VW Beetle of EVs. Please

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 4 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Certainly I would appreciate it. There are some in China. Aptera is probably your best bet, if they ever figure out how to ship a car.

I don't see the need for the infotainment dash

I wish they would go back to installing double-din radios so I could install whatever I wanted.

Then make the car controls a completely parallel system.

personal data tracking

This is for the manufacturer, not for you.

self-driving

I appreciate driver assistance systems as a safety feature.

lack of physical buttons

I'm honestly stumped on this one. I've never found anyone who said "ew look at all these filthy buttons, let's get rid of them" but manufacturers keep doing it. Kinda like Android OS and Android OEMs copy all the dumb shit Apple does for seemingly no reason. Some people say it's cost-cutting but how much does a panel of buttons cost? And what about lost consumer satisfaction? Does that not matter?

Maybe you can work on it in your garage for the most part for simple maintenance.

Nobody makes this because it loses the manufacturer money and people continue to tolerate it, much less all the other corporate shitfuckery across various industries.

Aptera won't even have 1st party techs. They're just going to publicly publish repair manuals and outsource repair to 3rd parties.

I'd really like to have an EV one day but seems like they are all super expensive, have no sense of ownership like typical cars, are constantly tracking you, and are trying to shove extra features down your throat.

This is nothing to do with EVs. Gas cars have all that dumb shit too.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citro%C3%ABn_Ami_(electric_vehicle)

Tons of others, too. But yes, the selection is still obviously a bit spotty. Hopefully more practical and simple (and affordable) models turn up.

[–] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Genuinely the first thought that came into my head. I want one.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

What the hell. It's so silly and cute and I want one.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I test drove one and I loved it. It was like a dodgem. It was surprisingly roomy inside, insanely responsive, light, airy, and I just had a big fucking stupid grin on my big fucking stupid face the whole time.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

Looks like Canada can't have it though. Living here is better than a warzone at least.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

In all technology, personal data tracking effectively subsidizes the cost of the device. They can run lower margins with a data-based revenue stream to appease shareholders. If you want privacy, you’ll have to pay more for it.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But does this option even exist?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It does in other forms of technology. It’s only a matter of time until the news shames the practice in the automotive industry enough for a manufacturer to realize that privacy has value in marketing.

[–] GeneralDingus@lemmy.cafe 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if shame will necessarily do anything unless consumers talk with their money but I really hope we're given at least some options!

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

With enough shaming of the practice across the industry, a manufacturer will use privacy as a marketing tool. We just have to get past the phase of ignorance of the practice.

[–] GeneralDingus@lemmy.cafe 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But does it really subsidize the cost at all? Seems like its more of an additional revenue stream than anything else. So many EVs with tracking are still expensive, so how are they meaningfully making the cars more affordable?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

Why do you think Google can sell the Pixel at such a low price point? The hardware far outperforms other phones in its price range. The difference is that Google is very clear about its use of data collection, and automotive companies are still new to the game, selling it to anyone with a checkbook.

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9152633

https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I think so, once infrastructure is built out and battery tech has been perfected.

As is, the market is small because you have to be a home owner (good luck charging in an apartment parking lot), and you need to bear the expense of new battery packs every few years.

I could get an EV for my next car, but when my loan is paid off, I now need to get a loan for a new car, or new batteries. A gas car might be less reliable, but it will run for several more years with minor work after the loan is paid off.

[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Most EVs have a 10 year / 100K miles warranty, at least in the US.

[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My family uses to have a leaf. Battery degradation was considered normal wear and tear, and the thing only had a reliable range of like 50 miles by the time they got rid of it.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

1st gen leaf? If so, it only had like 85 mile range new, so that degradation isn't the worst. It has air cooled batteries too, so it's known to have probably the fastest degradation in the US market

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GeneralDingus@lemmy.cafe 2 points 7 months ago

I think that makes sense. Seems to me that the EV market is mostly considered a luxury commodity at the moment and so isn't being made as a dependable and meaningful alternative to ICE machines yet. It partly worries me though that some law initiatives are pushing for EVs but without addressing waste, and ownership and reliability that applies to dumb cars. I've owned my ICE car for almost 2 decades, and that's something I'd like to see in an EV before I can make the switch.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bobburger@fedia.io 3 points 7 months ago

Canoo vehicles seem pretty simple in principle, but we won't know for sure until they actually start shipping (if they ever do).

As an added bonus, I think they look bad ass.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I know right, I've never understood why manufacturers making cars for people suffering from range anxiety want to have a motor to open and close the trunk or extend the door handles. Like people can't just lift it up or shut it by hand as we've done for decades?

[–] kinttach@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

A typical EV has 65 kWh of power. It can provide 65 thousand watts of power for a full hour. That is a massive amount of power compared to which opening a trunk is an unnoticeable rounding error.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

For me it's more about repairability and cost. I can easily replace a mechanical handle, that would probably be tougher and cheaper than an electric moving one.

[–] kinttach@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Okay, I see. My 10-year-old gas car also has a powered liftgate. I hadn’t considered that to be an EV-related feature. Powered door handles are more common on EVs though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mennorobert@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lotus is releasing an EV to the British market that is very stripped down and pretty simple as far as cars go. Problem is I don't think they are releasing to the US market.

[–] You999@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

Hard to believe that lotus would be the one to give us a stripped down value EV. It would be kinda ironic though since without lotus, tesla wouldn't have a body for the original roadster that got them where they are today.

load more comments
view more: next ›