this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
42 points (76.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43962 readers
1413 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello! I've been searching for a reddit alternative, and yes, I've picked Lemmy and Raddle, but here's the thing. My morbid curiosity is perked up, and a part of me wants to join the "free speech" alternatives, like Saidit, Poal, etc. What's wrong with me that I want to join toxic places? I mean, yes I'll find a whole new perspective (albeit wrong), on political topics, but a part of me wants to be the antagonist, and post lefty memes, and music with a left-leaning message (bands from r/rabm) I know that's like kicking the hornet's nest, so you don't need to start in with "that's a bad idea" I know it is. My main point/question is, is it wrong to join a site with potential hate speech? Does it make someone a bad person?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 73 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It potentially opens you up to radicalization in the wrong direction.

[–] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 18 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Generally radicalization in any direction is bad.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Why? Shouldn't the measure of good and bad be with respect to how correct it is, not how closely the position aligns with the status quo?

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The word implies an unhealthy and incorrect degree. Otherwise you're not radicalized, just representing an opinion.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

the word radical means "from or going to a root or source."

it simply implies wanting to deal with the root cause of issues. the word you are looking for is probably "extremism"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

Yes, hence they reveal that they think the staus quo is the correct way of doing things... Though to be fair, being a little reactionary is hard wired in human brains and is especially prone to surface for those politically illiterate (or idiots in Greek).

[–] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

To be fair I think my definition of radicalize is wrong given the other comments. Ive always used it as a synonym for extremism.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

Enlightened centrist entered the chat.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

It's always that instance.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There are a few instances like that, not just one

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I want so bad for them to add auto-hiding for comments from certain instances.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

we need radical change tbh, things are not sustainable the way they are. just pays to be cautious about it though.

[–] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 66 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Good luck man, you're about to learn how easy it is to get banned on those free speech alternatives. Still funny though.

Be careful however. No matter what, you're still just a brain in a flesh jar. You are susceptible to false information and lies as your brain can't really differentiate between false and correct info that well.

You are not immune to propaganda

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Be careful however. No matter what, you're still just a brain in a flesh jar. You are susceptible to false information and lies as your brain can't really differentiate between false and correct info that well.

You are not immune to propaganda

I never understood this argument. How is it any different for leftist propaganda? This just feels like telling someone to stop thinking because you're on our team now and we want to make sure you don't leave.

[–] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

How is this different than leftist propaganda?

It's not. In no way, shape, and or form. Once more, you are not immune to propaganda.

Again, I'm not stating you shouldn't seek out people who disagree with you, I seek these people out often, but you need to understand what your brain will do.

You should generally be cognizant of bias and the fact that you will, inevitably, accept without confirmation some information or internalize information you've confirmed incorrect. This is not only true to one group, and is just as true for those under the umbrella of "leftist" as much as under the term "alt right".

I will state it's less dangerous to be less cautious here than a free speach absolutist community. Here, we value truth. There, they value all speach even objectively false. Here, you'll see false info removed there, definitionally, or is not.

Lastly, for fascism, death of truth is a defining reality. To paraphrase Mussolini let not truth stand on a pillar except insomuch as it assists in our goals. In the places where absolutist freedom of speach reigns fascists, famously very good propagandists, thrive. This is a danger above a left winger repeating false statistics around racism in the police force, or the rates of spousal abuse. Or even myself lying about that Mussolini quote at the beginning of this paragraph

Thank you for the responce however and the respectful tone you took, I hope I clarified>

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 46 points 7 months ago (22 children)

They’re not looking for freedom of speech but freedom from consequences.

You’ll get banned there real quick.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

you get banned from individual instances but not from the fediverse/lemmy which is kind of the point

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Fizz 20 points 7 months ago

You can if you want. You'll certainly find new perspectives however you will be unlikely to get any good discussion. If you go there to antagonize they will simply ban you as they don't want lefty memes or left leaning messages.

I don't think being on the same platform as hate speech makes you a bad person. You're only wasting your time and exposing your self to needless hate and toxicity.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it makes you a bad person, but I do think you'd be banned faster than green grass through a goose

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

Green grass through a goose, that's definitely a new one

[–] wiase@discuss.online 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think it is generally a bad idea to support sites that promote hatred and fascist ideas by providing them traffic and content.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Perhaps an unpopular take, but my suggestion would be to think if you can come from the perspective of love: do you love these people, and care about them, though they've believed lies? Can you converse with them with respect, listening to why they feel how they do, and be patient to bring truth only to help them, not to self-righteously vindicate yourself?


Then again, this is the internet, so if you jump in, post inflammatory memes, pat yourself on the back for being so clever, and jump out again, and show us the results; perhaps I'll giggle along with the rest of us.


For a different take, you might like to note that part of the effectiveness of propaganda is not a good rational explanation but repeated asserted lies. Jumping into a different set of assertions can help pop you out of ones you've wrongly believed from your own background - but it can also wear you down to believe, or half believe, what the other community is saying even if it's without merit. Keep a check on the things you read: What's the actual source behind this? Could these be repeatedly misconstruing that thing in the same way (so they look coherent but aren't)? Is there some useful truth in here I missed? And is there a subtle lie attached to the truth? And there's lots of other helpful questions you can ask: but keep a sensible head and be prepared to step back and look at something else.

[–] sinewyshadow@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've thought about being compassionate with these people, but the moment you get called a jewish slur or the n word, all compassion kinda goes out the window.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

I feel for you, though that's where the true test of compassion is.

[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago

This is the right answer. Hatred just breeds more hatred. If you approach with love and understanding (or at least a desire to understand), you'll have a much better chance of changing hearts and minds. Try to meet in the middle and you might be able to point them in the right direction.

[–] specter@board.minimally.online 13 points 7 months ago

Free speech enthusiasts are exercising hatred. Before non-hateful people realize this they sometimes conflate it with the inversion: speaking truth to power. Or sometimes simply "freedom" which isn't perfectly absolute when we live in a society. If you wanna witness hatred then follow the free speech thread.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Places that advertise themselves as being free speech

  • Expectation: You are free to say whatever you please
  • Reality: Oops! All CSAM/racism and they ban on a hair
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

those things can honestly be posted here on .ml or on instances like hexbear, blahaj and such.

if you want to challenge your and other's perspectives, you would do better doing so in instances such as lemmy.world or maaybe reddit, you are likely to encounter some pushback but they generally can be talked to. free-speech code-for-fascism sites will just ban you at best. if you actually want to troll them you will probably only have a chance if you organize.

that said if you are feeling masochistic you can go on 4chan, its probably where most of them hang out publicly, and its the rare place where they actually wont ban you for nothing.

[–] SteposVenzny@beehaw.org 6 points 7 months ago

It doesn’t make you a bad person but it’s not a healthy way to spend your time. It creates a feedback loop of finding things that upset you, ineffectually combating them, getting upset at the lack of positive results, and trying to fix that dissatisfaction by finding more things that upset you to fight against. You’ll think of it as a way to entertain yourself but, on balance, you’re the one getting the most stressed out by it.

If you want to troll the far right, you’re better off trying to do that in spaces where other people can see you doing it because that has an actual possibility of affecting their behavior. Real life, for example.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Just do it and post screen caps here.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

Sounds like a waste of precious time

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Learn how to mask your IP using VPNs or other open proxies before any of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

I guess lots of people can relate to this on Tw(X)tter. After it was bought by mister X. it went downhill. Still a lot of left leaning people are on it with the idea to fight from within (or because they think "everyone is on it" or "important people are there". Personally I think it is a lost cause and would leave as soon as possible. Apart from that do not underestimate how you can be influenced if you don't do fact checking. A person I know told me year ago that they liked to read on a far right forum years (for fun or something) and is now like "yeah, I also think migration is a bit of problem". Go figure :(

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 7 months ago

I am not familiar with the ones you mention. I do however suggest you read this: https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/05/01/neutral-vs-conservative-the-eternal-struggle/

Especially the part you find if you search for "Voat" on that page.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

part of me wants to be the antagonist, and post lefty memes, and music with a left-leaning message

that can be this very instance on lemmy.ml or many many others right here, like hexbear, blahaj and such, if you want people you will slightly antagonize, but can at least be talked to go to lemmy.world, maaaaybe reddit. its generally not worth your time to go to free-speech code-for-fascism sites because at best you will be banned. if you really wanna troll them, you wont be effective unless you organize.

if you really want to be a masochist, go to 4chan or something, its where most of them probably are publicly.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you know who you are and what you believe in then you should have no fear like others are saying. Go wherever you want and talk to whoever you want. I used to regularly post on /r/debatefascism before it got banned on reddit. I was disappointed when it got banned.

When you argue with someone online, you'll never change their opinion.. but you may sway some random lurker just browsing through.

I understand that a lot of the far right use "free speech" as essentially a dog whistle- but freedom of expression in my opinion is a vital part of a free society. That doesn't mean private places like Lemmy instances have any obligation to follow free speech. But I do support and respect places that do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dendr0@fedia.io 2 points 7 months ago

The "free speech" instances are just cesspools of a different shade. Sticking to any one singular platform, you'll eventually notice them start to slide towards a groupthink/echochamber of sorts, regardless of the focus of the instance.

Easiest way is to just browse multiple instances of different types. At least the unhinged insanity of each side cancels each other out for the most part.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί