2tapry

joined 1 year ago
[–] 2tapry 4 points 1 year ago

I would suggest reconsidering. EVs make terrible cats.

Agree, they just don't purrrrr like real ones.

[–] 2tapry 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Everyone is gravitating to SUV EVs which are hideoisly inefficient. It’s like the McMansion-isation of personal transport.

I've heard this more than once recently - what a lot of rot. A medium size electric SUV is no more inefficient than a medium size electric car. It may carry a little more weight around and have a little more wind resistance, so may require/use a little more stored electricity, but not much. If the owner actually needs the extra space or clearance of an SUV (I do, but diesel at the moment not yet electric, mostly due to range issues), then I don't see anything wrong with that.

However, I do agree when it comes to those who buy and drive SUV/Utes etc., just for the Wank factor - I always suspect it is something to do with small penis syndrome ;)

[–] 2tapry 3 points 1 year ago

I don't know how they are tracking now, but this comapny made some waves with their seaweed approach back in 2021

Terribly! They promised 80-90% reduction of methane back then, but recent trials in Aus show it having less than 30% reduction and the cow looses considerable weight. So the end result is more like 10% reduction and long term effects on the cow are still to come in.

There is another one available now that claims 30% reduction (forgot its name) but I've not seen any real trial results yet.

[–] 2tapry 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

I think the focus on cars is a bigger problem than what energy source they use. EVs are taking over anyway, there is no standing in the way of that.

If there was an alternative that isn't likely to take multiple generations to implement, I would agree, but that is not the case?

If we want to reduce emissions (pollution isn’t much of a problem in windswept NZ) then we need to focus on more efficient modes of transport and lifestyles. Not more cars.

I suspect your definition of pollution doesn't match what most consider it to be. NZ is a terrible polluter of the environment, which includes green house gases (transport and agriculture) and the effects that has on climate change? I don't think the idea is to have more cars, but to replace existing polluting cars with more environmentally friendly EV's?

[–] 2tapry 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Completely nuts to get rid of it! Without incentives like this, most will just continue on as normal, which will result in a very prolonged, if ever, move away from high polluting fossil fuel vehicles.

Some other subjects are simply crazy too.

[–] 2tapry 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What children’s bedrooms look like around the world

Link from The Bulletin (Spinnoff) this morning gives an intriguing look into the world through the state of kids bedrooms. Those who have young kids might see their rooms a little differently after seeing these?

[–] 2tapry 3 points 1 year ago

Minimum 1C last night and currently 2 going on 3C. Plenty of lambies around, some a bit muddy though.

Light frost last night meant a bit of cover for some plants that I've put out a bit early.

[–] 2tapry 3 points 1 year ago

🏚️->🏡🎆

[–] 2tapry 3 points 1 year ago

Same. If you have an ad blocker or similar and zap the image, the story is revealed.

[–] 2tapry 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If fonterra owns the lab, do current dairy farmers just transition to being owners that aren’t contributing milk?

I suspect Frontera would 'pay' some farmers to transition to produce the raw ingredients required to produce alternatives. Thus, their expertise could continue to be utilised along with their export strengths. The issue will be with those stubborn farmers who refuse or are reluctant to change - the almighty dollar will speak to them eventually.

Forestry workers can drive from a bigger city...

Don't see that here. There are local Forestry, Sawmill, and Transport (logging) workers who live in the community and, of what I see, contribute more to the town than dairy workers. It takes very few people to run a modern, robotic dairy these days. Usually just the owner/manager and a couple of foreign workers - often seasonal, so they come and go, most living on the farms, not in the township. Very few farmers shop locally, they tend to travel into the "city" to purchase and/or get groceries delivered (as do I). A few spend a bit at the pub/club, but not as much as you would probably think.

I personally believe there would be an increase in population with a move away from dairy - but that's just my thinking based on what I see.

[–] 2tapry 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks. Hadn't seen that one, but have seen similar stories.

I personally don't have a problem with 'lab grown' food, but I suspect some do. 'Plant based' is probably more palatable to the public opinion? I'm not sure if I want a lab grown food to necessarily replicate existing food, I'd rather just have good nutritious food that tastes good - plants do that already? Except for BACON, there is simply no substitute for BACON - sorry Miss Piggy@#@! If they make a lab grown BACON I'm all in!!!

[–] 2tapry 3 points 1 year ago

Dipel was the product I couldn't remember the name of, but I can't find it for sale in New Zealand.

I found it on an Aussie Bunning's website: Yates 40g Natures Way Caterpillar Killer Dipel Insecticide but that's not helpful :(

view more: ‹ prev next ›