Aabbcc

joined 1 year ago
[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

I play old school maplestory on maplelegends. They have strict "no real world trade" rules and no pay to win. It really is just the game how it should be played, which really highlights all the flaws in the game (there are many)

Obviously the main draw is nostalgia, so if it's something you've never played it won't have much value, but the community is great and it's an mmo with lots to do and endgame content to aspire to

[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 19 points 4 days ago (6 children)

People who damage culturally significant, irreplaceable things [...] deserve this kind of punishment or worse

Removed unnecessary caveat

Boy you're going to hate to find out what oil companies are doing

[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Again, why not assume people saying we should have been off fossil fuels a decade ago mean that we should have been researching and investing in alternatives 50 years ago? If we did, we would have a way better chance if being off fossil fuels a decade ago

[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Nice dude you owned those activists

[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You don't think maybe we would be closer to having that means of energy production now if we started 50 years ago when we noticed the impacts of climate change?

Youre assuming climate activists have the MORONIC idea of just transitioning to shit tech, instead of the idea of investing in making tech that can replace oil usage

[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

"No art on a dead planet" is a braindead justification and does not in any way outline how vandalism of art is supposed to translate into climate activism

If damaged art hurts your feelings get mad at the government killing all art on the planet and not the activists partially damaging some art.

"I understand that we're pissing people off but there's no other way to get attention" ... not particularly compelling rebuttals in the critics section

Why not? How else should they be getting attention?

"JSO was central in setting the 2024 Labour agenda" is utterly deluded,

I won't disagree

This really reinforces my view that JSO are terribly naive and have no real idea on how their actions will seriously lead to mass change of opinions on climate change.

Yeah I don't get the vibe from you that you'd change your view

Partially related but do you have any evidence that jso tactics has a "greater backlash from the exact kind of educated people most likely to get involved in climate activism" or is that kinda vibes based

[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (11 children)
[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also the section "jso critics" and "does it work"

[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

YouTube provides transcripts. It's in the discription on the website

[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Kinda dumb of you to assume the only option to stop oil is an immediate cessation of all usage

[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's a conspiracy man

view more: next ›