I think we're talking past each other, the x who lost his account (I think) is now x12345678998765 the post behind the link was made by the account x12345678908765 they are not the same account, so the link does neither disprove nor prove the article in the main post which makes the comment by sam just useless and deceiving
Arnj
joined 1 year ago
I'm not sure what you are trying to do with this link, the two x accounts are not the same....
If they are not on the surface finding them is not the hardest part...
Well we can't start right now, X hasn't started yet and Y isn't as good as the fossil alternative. And anyway we're missing the 1.5° target so there is obviously no reason to get carbon neutral anymore ....
Still nice to see that the swiss are aware of the problem and are setting goalposts let's hope they actually get them.
Agreed, aviation and special vehicles like firetrucks for those kinds of vehicles eFuels MIGHT be suitable, but it for sure should not be used in the day-to-day car used by everybody.