BenevolentOne

And the lucky (not smart) among them get wealth, real power, and nobody to point out the problems with their reckless ideas.

I'm looking at a copy of Newton's principia and it's pretty obvious from the first chapter that y'all are fucking idiots. (Except OP, OP is cool).

Try reading it sometime. Imagine leveling this kind of critique at any other book you've never read.

Souls is just a polished version of kings field, so having played them all, I'm qualified to say it's a major step up in the series

Yes, it's easily the best of the three.

I have some news for you, here is a real story.

I'm a programmer, a pretty good one, I have built real products worth millions of dollars and I'm doing alright. I'm no rockstar, I'm no pundit.

I have a raspberry pi connected to a touchscreen I use for home automation, it's a nice little home IT project, I don't really spend a lot of time on it. It's a hobby and something to walkthrough/demo/make available for the kids to hack on.

I wanted to tighten up the install, get automatic updates running, get it in full kiosk mode and add a couple features. Nice little Saturday project, figured it take a couple hours on the outside, hardest part would be mapping the touchscreen again.

Claude did it for me in 20 minutes. So I got to spend an hour and a half thinking of features I wanted to include, pretty great for me! Pretty great for IT! Need doesn't enter into it.

Maybe not great if your boss is a pinhead.

You owe it to yourself to borrow an oculus from a 14 year old and play Alyx.

We truly are in the Dreamcast vs. N64 years of VR gaming.

That was in 2011, 15 years ago.

It takes a little over 10 years to recognize that a game (or anything really) was revolutionary. You have to wait until all of the chaff has been forgotten, leaving only the revolutionary games behind.

Here are some of my top picks for what folks will look back on when they right the 2025-2035 had no good games version of your post.

Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom. Vampire survivors. Hades. Elden Ring. Disco Elysium.

And one which will probably be a cult classic/sleeper hit: Return of the Obra Dinn.

Just for a start.

Easier to start with the plain truth, something you can see with your own eyes, and work your way to the subtler arguments.

https://archive.org/details/earth_not_a_globe_review_1893-1897_201804/mode/1up

I spent a couple days on and off reading about this theory, I read a few papers in the field and some of Penrose's work (I didn't go grab his books). So, thanks. It was interesting. I have had some physicists mention to me in passing that quantum consciousness was a junk field, but I hadn't looked into it.

I agree, this is definitely bullshit.

1. Penrose himself attempts to dodge this in the first paragraph, but why are we groping for a special theory of consciousness at all?

2. Quantum mechanics is in everything, without it, fundamental processes (like light passing through your window) can not adequately be explained. Just because something has 'got a quantum' or whatever doesn't instantly make it special from a physical perspective (you don't see scientists tossing out conversation of energy or causality because stuff's 'got a quantum' or whatever).

3. You might be interested in some of the recent work demonstrating that anesthetics work on plants. Not a microtubule in sight.

Hey, look, you can read the paper! I wonder if the paper tells us what it is about?

courses.csail.mit.edu/6.803/pdf/turing.pdf