Bernie2028

joined 1 year ago
[–] Bernie2028@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

At this point you really need to define what a “war” is

"a state of armed conflict between different nations or states or different groups within a nation or state"

Key word, "between." You can't have a war if no one declares war.

[–] Bernie2028@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Chinese OFFICIALS idiot.

[–] Bernie2028@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Only when the US and Libya officially declare war on each other is it war.

[–] Bernie2028@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not my job to educate the uneducated.

[–] Bernie2028@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (22 children)

Yeah they totally just invited their fellow fascists over for funzies.

[–] Bernie2028@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"Blood and soil" nationalism, Han chinese supremacy, xenophobia and some of the most closed borders in the world, repression of minorities and political dissidents, etc. etc. etc. etc.

[–] Bernie2028@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She travelled to fucking Beijing to meet with party officials. But yeah I'm sure random ass nobodies invited her.

[–] Bernie2028@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You're fighting with the air. I very clearly said Libya wasn't ok.

You're right, massacres aren't battles and we shouldn't call them that. Of course that doesn't make it any better but why call it a battle if it's not?

[–] Bernie2028@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Well yeah, you OBJECTIVELY can't call what happened in Libya a "war". It was bad and unnecessary, but by definition, not a war... You did not have US troops fighting Libyan troops.

[–] Bernie2028@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Obviously different and you know it.

[–] Bernie2028@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (25 children)

Pushing for stronger ties:

The AfD has positioned itself in opposition to the German government's critical policy toward China [....] "attempt to implement green-woke ideology and US geopolitical interests under the guise of a strategy for German foreign policy"

For AfD, human rights criticism 'totally irrelevant'

Geopolitically, said Schroeder, the AfD sees the traditional Western ties with the United States, which it regards as hegemonic, as having past their use-by date.

AfD 'understands, accepts Chinese way of governing'

Frankly, the only difference between the fascist AfD and the fascist CCP is the AfD claims to support democracy and rule of law.

[–] Bernie2028@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Why else would the Chinese meet with a runner-up party? The article clearly says AfD is hoping for stronger connections with China. This is just another case of fascists working with fascists.

They're already having each others' back, the nazi bitch with CCP connections is straight up defending China:

[AfD co-leader] Weidel herself knows the People's Republic of China very well. She spent six years living there on a German Academic Exchange Service scholarship and completed her doctorate on the Chinese pension system

She has also ridiculed German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock's criticism of the human rights situation in China.

"God help us: Baerbock is on a new mission in #China. She wants to emphasize the 'shared European conviction.' This already fails because it is not only #France which does not share this conviction..."

view more: ‹ prev next ›