Camille_Jamal

I think if we all do our best to engage in good faith. There will always be bad actors or someone having a bad day who doesn’t have the energy to do so, which should be recognized. If you go into a conversation with the intent of sharing something or learning something, usually it will be a good or productive conversation, assuming the other person(s) are not bad actor(s)

I think that yeah genetics and whatnot where you are basically guess and checking anyways is where it’s good. Kinda like brute forcing a login, the more attempts you have, the more likely you are to stumble upon the answer. I remember dad telling me about folding@home and to me it sounds like a good idea, and that there, is an ai!

Forgot who but I saw someone who trained his own genai on his own drawings and got it to inbetween his animation which is definitely one of the less bad uses of it. As someone who hand animated once or twice, inbetweening is quite boring tho the generated frames should be a checked over and manually corrected.

I saw a guy who did inbetweening for his animation with a homebrew model he trained with only his data. That is an idea, but the tech is still pretty new

I’m open to talking about ai though I have a bit of an anti ai perspective, shame that even the 5 of us able to hold a conversation get tarred with the same brush

Does free speech not include technologies to access said freedom of speech? Anyways, here for an open and free web

I've heard of it, might read (future me will read it, dont worry)

ok ive never heard of it outside of the book lol

ill just linux when frankenstein works lol

What the fuck

I don’t want eyes anymore, thanks mate

No I think they just haven’t experienced that great of relationships, wild guess

No, probably cuz I’m not in the worst part of the world or the web

If you’d like to elaborate? If not that’s fine too