CautiousBrowser

joined 1 year ago
[–] CautiousBrowser@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah I'll try these for sure! Thanks for listing them here. I wasn't aware of alternative search engines outside of DDG and Qwant.

Once again it's a shame i wasn't aware of Neeva, would have loved to at least give it a try (and probably pay for it). :(

[–] CautiousBrowser@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Honestly, I've been using it as my default research engine for a year and... I'm now manualy changing to Google everytime I'm REALLY searching for something.

Qwant results are generaly several steps below.

[–] CautiousBrowser@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Fuck, I would have used this and this only, if only I'd have heard of it :(

[–] CautiousBrowser@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

As far as I know, ~~philosybin~~ Psilocybin is currently tested for a lot of applications, but none linked to Elzeimer/dementia.

Would you have an article/paper to point me towards?

[–] CautiousBrowser@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Unless I'm mistaken, if you remove the LGBTQ community everybody that left... Is cis persons. As in general "techy" world, most of the person using fediverse (and it's currently changing rapidly, which is good) is male.

I may very well be mistaken, but the way this sentence is constructed make it feels like one information is being phrased in a way that fitting a certain point of view.

Anyway, I'm probably over analysing, as usual.

[–] CautiousBrowser@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Euuuuh... Is it me or is some parts of the article setting up/opposing LGBTQ+ against non-lgbtq?

"One of the interesting dynamics of the discussion so far is so much of the resistance to Meta has come from queer and trans people, and that most of the loudest supporters of Meta in the fediverse are cis guys." This sentence may be technicaly right, but it's ~~sooooo stupid~~ mostly interpretation. Edit: wrong and uncalled for

Starting from there, the article seems to be as much about "us va them" than threads and meta...