It can be both depending on how you handle operator precendence.

PEMDAS definitely doesn't result in 1, but in 9, since under PEMDAS multiplication and division have the same priority (and thus should resolve left-to-right). So, you should resolve to 9 (6/2(2+1) => 6/2(3) => 6/2*3 => 3*3 => 9).

However, there's also PEJMDAS, which suggests that implied multiplication has an operator precedence greater than regular multiplication/division (J for Juxtaposition). This version says you should do 6/2(2+1) => 6/(2*2 + 2*1) => 6/(4+2) => 6/6 => 1.

The issue is that there is no universal agreement on which is correct. Most textbooks don't even use the / operator, but instead rely on writing out the full fraction like ⁶⁄₂₍₂₊₁₎ or ⁶⁄₂(2+1). This removes any ambiguity there might be, and thus they don't touch on which one is actually correct.

Most (but not all) calculators these days will treat implied multiplication the same as regular multiplication, so you get 9 in the given example. Most programming languages do the same, or outright disallow implied multiplication because it only confuses people. Academics won't ever use the ambiguous notation and will make sure to remove any ambiguity by either adding parentheses or using a notation like ⁶⁄₂₍₂₊₁₎, which makes things much more clear.

Neither 9 nor 1 is wrong, the question is just stupid.

Yes, apparently a custom hypervisor has been built that essentially allows you to bypass Denuvo on all games, but it appears that there's been good progress on removing Denuvo altogether again as well (like a more traditional crack).

Germany doesn't have jurisdiction on servers hosted in Austria. This "German law" defense doesn't make the remotest amount of sense.

Proton edited and deleted some of their responses because it made them look even worse. You can find one here: https://archive.ph/quYyb

Complete delusion believing Trump will "stand up for the little guy". The GOP is the party that gutted net neutrality after all. They had the Chevron doctrime overturned. The Thiel-Musk funded party standing up for "little tech"? Please.

The CEO tried to spin it off as "missing context" but the responses show he's either completely delusional, has been comatose for the past two decades or is just pro-Trump. I can't look inside his head, but his tacit endorsement of the party actively dismantling US democracy is not something that can really "lack context".

Proton, the company, has donated to liberal parties. The CEO seems to be a bit more of the "libertarian" type, that doesn't seem to mind everything the GOP did in the past years.

We've likely known about Parkinson's since the 12th century, just never named it as such. But it's very much possible that pollutants increase the risk.

1 makes lawmakers more susceptible to corruption.

That article doesn't contradict what he said.

From the article:

“I cannot force migrants to remain in a country that does not want them. But if that country returns them, it must be with dignity and respect – for both them and our nation. In civilian planes, and without treating them like criminals, we will welcome our compatriots. Colombia deserves respect.”

The Trump admin explanation doesn't line up with the timeline of events.

Currencies going up in value tends to not be great for an economy, as people will save instead of spend. It stops being a currency and becomes somewhat of an asset. A slowly depreciating currency tends to foster the most economic growth.

You jest, but we all know the damage you could do with a 5oz bottle of shampoo is incalculable.

The problem is the aging population.

"Narcissist" is not a slur. Additionally, he's calling you out for your bad behaviour and online harassment, not "because you have NPD".

If you have a mental disorder that prevents you from behaving nicely online, it may be wiser not to comment. Because people won't see your NPD as an excuse, but as a justification showing that you do demonstrate bad behaviour and therefore are prone to breaking the (social) rules. Ergo justifying the ban.

🫶