I do agree with you that that packaging is misleading. But I do think the issue is the lack of the word "vegan" on the front, not the usage of the word "sausage".
Because this vote basically would require it to change into "cocktail cilinders" or something equally stupid, rather than "vegan cocktail sausages" which imo is much clearer.
In the Netherlands, to become a judge you must first study Dutch law at a university, then get at least 2 years of work experience in a law-related job. Then you take a second study of 15 months to at most 4 years to become a judge, which also has very strict selection criteria.
After that, you can become a judge. The judiciary branch selects its own members in that way.
If you want to become a higher level judge, you need 10 years of related experience and another study taking at most 2 years.
There's no supreme court in the Netherlands. The legislative may make laws that supersede the constitution, but only if a very strong argumentation as to why is provided. The Raad van State (Council of State) can judge whether the cabinet has properly applied the law when writing new laws or taking executive decisions. The cabinet can suggest who should join the council, but the council determines if they are a good candidate (ranging from judges to scientists to former lawmakers). They then serve "for life" meaning until they turn 70, after which they retire. There can only be 11 members at a time.
I'm sure Palpatine knows fluent German from his time in Heidelberg.
You could have a hired group of people to laugh at certain jokes in a theatre show? Would sound exactly like and have the same purpose as a laugh track. It'd be live and not recorded, but just as non-genuine as actual laughter from the audience.
Four more years for Carter so he can vote them out again?
LLMs work pretty well for narrowly-scoped questions like this.
You're in a 2 party FPTP system, it doesn't give you reasonable representation by design.
You get someone you dislike and someone you dislike even more. Voting 3rd party is literally voting against your interests. That's not an ideological choice, or a political choice, it's a deeply saddening mathematical reality.
The only way you get your position heard is by fighting candidates for your least-disliked party during the primaries. Get someone you like as the congressional or senatorial candidate. Help them get elected. Even a small number of senators or congressmen can make the difference (see Synema and Manchin for example, or hell even Boebert and MTG who all wield(ed) significant political power well beyond what their voteshare should give them).
By fighting the fight you can't win (e.g. the vote for president), you only weaken your least-disliked choice. So whoever you really don't want ends up getting elected. Why? Because the US election system sucks balls.
Voting for the Green party makes it less likely that climate change legislation goes through. That is the sad, paradoxical reality. Being an ideological crusador in this matter doesn't help anyone and is due to the reality of the shit voting system, despite the best intentions, immoral.
a blank nothingness isn't bad
That's a matter of opinion. The fact you cease to exist may very well be considered scary, even by atheists.
Graphite conducts electricity I think, but a tomato won't get somewhere where it can do that easily.
There's no such thing as "the internet's public square". It is the "X-owned public square". In an offline public square, the government owns the square, so free speech protections apply. But this "square" is privately owned. There's an incredibly fundamental difference here.
What about the raptor engine that's recursively nested inside a larger raptor engine?