Alternatively, you get a second cat and they both hate each other which leads to years of behavioral issues too. I don't think having multiple cats is always the best way to go, especially staggering them out like that. I've had cats my whole life and each one is different. I think if you do plan on having multiple, getting siblings is probably your best bet since they've always known one another, but even then that's no guarantee they'll enjoy eachothers company once they reach adulthood.
CmdrShepard49
joined 1 year ago
Dude if you think this is bad you should read the stuff posted by that one specific individual here at least 16 times a day. Your question at least has relevance and is light hearted. I wouldn't feel embarrassed about posting this at all.
Both outcomes benefit them. Either it scares and subdues everyone or does the exact opposite which gives them even more 'justification' for crackdowns.
I'd say a full 100% of us are considering both guys are yellow guy.
Looking at their chart near the top, it appears as if violence scores higher in most categories except for "non-violence security force defections" which eclipses every other datapoint by 20x-40x which probably realllly skews the average in favor of non-violence.
People are downvoting you for attempting to capitalize on a tragedy and derail the conversation toward your own toxic bigotry.
Is it being "honest about these kinds of stats" when you very specifically attack someone mentioning a part of these stats? You call it "whataboutism" and claim they're "derailing the conversation" all while you completely derail the discussion with your own whataboutism and act like some innocent victim. It's incredibly toxic.
Not only that, but nobody ever "asked why men do this" either like they're claiming. This person is clearly trying to push the conversation into something else entirely
That seems like a dangerous way of thinking. You can't ever hope to stop something if you refuse to understand it.
That user never stated that you made that claim. You left all the context out of your quote for some odd reason...
That men are the ones who do it most is no doubt but that other person is wrong with their comment
But then you go on to edit your original comment and claim this user is "being salty"
Whoa, look at mister fancy pants here with his pot of boiling water.
view more: next ›
Not to mention our entire system of laws is based on pedantry where a comma here or misplaced word there can change the entire meaning of laws. Just because courts have ruled "routine warrantless searches" are permissible doesn't give these agents carte blanche to do as they please. Courts have also ruled that body cavity searches at the border can't be performed without a warrant or probable cause as just one example proving my point. Most of the case law mentioned here is regarding traffic stops and vehicle inspections which are far from searching through your device full of personal information and private communications.
Regardless of shitty court ruling, it should be evident to most people that this violates our Constitutional rights despite the government giving themselves permission to violate said rights.