That is surprising about Firefox - you'd have thought something that literally just runs JavaScript would be able to beat Firefox with all the UI, sandboxing, etc. 30% is a huge margin.

I normally use the "most appropriate" size, but this year I'm just using usize everywhere and it's a lot more fun. So far I haven't found any problem where it ran too slow and the problem was in my implementation and not my algorithm choice.

One effect of this is that someone steadily editing got more pixels than someone editing in batches, which felt like a feature when defending against trolls.

I don't know either - it could be purposely wrong to indicate that the figures aren't included, or to get attention via the mistake/meme. Or just that lots of people are fuzzy on the many Star * IPs.

There's some evidence that the bacteria in the air are different at day vs. at night

This is really interesting, do you have more info on this to share?

Edit: I was describing Voyager, not Thunder.

~~Yes! It's in a weird place, though.~~

~~Settings > Appearance > Themes > Device Mode~~
~~Set this to Android. It says it's a beta option, but I've not had any problems.~~

~~This setting was very welcome to me, since I was forever triggering back when I meant to upvote a comment.~~

This seems like a pretty standard solution for this kind of thing and I don't believe it would have been patentable - there's no breakthroughs here, even for 2007.

Y'all is great, but I can't use it without sounding like I'm taking the piss.

• email
• Nebula
• Kagi
• domains and VPSes
• VPN
• windyty

the video you mentioned, which everyone reading this should watch when it makes it over to Youtube

Ah, I'd looked to see if it had the First icon before mentioning it but it looks like he never uses the tags. For others, we're talking about How Fish Survive Hydro Turbines on Nebula (you can watch without an account).

Anyway, thanks for the other video, I'll watch it soon. It makes sense that sediment is a trickier problem than fish since, unlike fish, sediment isn't actively trying to get anywhere. When I first posted, I was imagining something like a conveyor belt, or perhaps pipes (either without turbines or ones pushing downstream) low down on the dam.

Very cool, and it reminds me of that album cover:

I guess it depends on whether you want recommendations about everything on the platform, or just from the subscriptions. I think for basic subscription recommendations you only need to track what the user has watched, although you can use a large number of profiles to get better recommendations even in that case.

Something like this would work:

1. import subscriptions watched and items from YouTube, Nebula, etc
   • ideally you'd dedupe items at this step and have a priority list (e.g. Nebula before Youtube)
2. allow manually marking items as watched, new subscriptions, etc
3. add newly watched items to the watched list
   • perhaps support re-syncing from sources, either manually or automatically

Then you can use something like https://github.com/mattwright324/youtube-metadata to pull down metadata and then you can make useful-enough recommendations to start with. You can add in other people's profiles if you want to expand it to unsubscribed channels, but this will get quite big (and potentially slow) at the scale needed to be useful.

I don't think this is as much work as you think, so someone else must have put more than these few minutes' thought and effort into it already.