So I'll be waiting for both removal of denuvo and for a "game of the year" version. Cool cool cool

1. Local translation which only happens when you trigger it I believe (and is cool)
2. Smart tab groups which i don't think anyone cares about and only happens when you ask it to
3. Link previews which I think happens on link hover which is undesirable if you don't want to accidentally do it (edit: see correction in reply)
4. A sidebar chatbot integration which you'd have to use on purpose
5. Someone said perplexity in search engine options which you'd have to do on purpose

I constantly catch people that supposedly check sources after using chatbots not doing it.

It makes it so I don't have to individually block the myriad trolls that emanate from that cesspool. I was seriously a couple pig shit images from never opening this site again.

This seems like a dev grappling, not sneaky AI booster bullshit.

I could agree with you if this poster hadn't posted a very similar article the previous day, or if the writer wasn't saying "I'm now an architect for a fleet of agents" which is definitely AI booster bullshit.

Lol. Lmao even

Petit bourgeois getting massacred. Who could have predicted this!?

People keep saying this. I don't want to work with an especially junior dev. I've been doing that my while career and the only thing good about it is that they get better.

Yes, but also not all studies are created equal (or done with honest intent on the first place)

Just fyi you can uninstall them without root, though it's slightly technical https://www.xda-developers.com/uninstall-carrier-oem-bloatware-without-root-access/

Isn't kernel level anticheat also looking for things like programs that do screen capture and programmatic input? Your assertion that server side anticheat must be implemented for every game is correct but I suspect you're oversimplifying what client side anti cheats do.

Where is the info about this?