I could maybe give him some leeway if the examples in the book itself showed responsible code, but they simply do not

From a worker standpoint, while you’re researching that thing you can find for yourself, someone of equal skill to you that is leveraging AI has solved 3 of those issues. And someone with more skill has solved 10. And someone with lesser has either crashed the network, or solved that same 1.

This is complete fantasy. I've personally watched like 10 SEs decide LLMs are the best things since sliced bread and talk up how much more productive they are and without exception they're all to varying degrees just worse at their job. Same for every other role I've observed as well, though I have fewer data points.

barely look back at what I have wrote.

Doing your best and messing up is fine. Straight up not caring or trying to improve is kind of rude to be honest.

Then you're just wrong. Clean Code directly tells you to make the mistakes the author of the article points out. The absurdity of the examples in the book should be evident enough.

You really think they're capable of pulling off a conspiracy like that without leaks?

That book did immeasurable damage to the software industry

You are asking everyone to trust in the system and behave as if everything is normal when the system is on fire and about to collapse.

There are people who both get llm summaries of their emails and get llm to rewrite what they send. It's amazing that anyone can't see how incredibly stupid it is

Believe it or not I can complain about more than one thing at a time.

GNOME being viewed as standard because of history is the source of a lot of complaints people have about Linux when comparing to windows and that never ceases to frustrate me

I'd say something like "uhhh what's up?" or "maybe?" and let them ask a specific question since saying yes sort of feels like agreeing to do the favor without knowing what it is first.

I'd way rather use a pwa than an election/react native/whatever app