FierroG

joined 8 months ago
[–] FierroG@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, ok, thanks... Too bad I can't 4x my budget to buy a second drive and build another pc or get a prebuilt nas, I laid out my options to avoid these "choose the option you don't have" scenarios, but I did want to see general discussion too so I'll take it as that.

[–] FierroG@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

So instead I should aim for a barracuda or a wd black or blue?

[–] FierroG@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks! I've been trying to read on people's experiences and discussions on the topic, I don't consider my knowledge to be extremely reliable so I wanted to hear opinions and discussions on the matter. The models I've been looking into say they're 24dB and 30 dB, but I've read some wd red models are crazy noisy too. From reviews I could find they validated these being quiet and generally more pleasant noises but, again, I couldn't say for certain.

I am having second thoughts on my plan, so I'll keep listening for discussions here.

[–] FierroG@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Interesting, Hadn't really read anything like that before, since nas drives have extra features and functions that seems like a thing they would set as an extra flag or something (if it's running on raid, then give up sooner).

What I meant by reliability was more about running the drive 24/7, as far as I could see they're the only ones intended to be used that way (besides surveilance drives). They are intended to run at all times, spin more frequently and sustain more vibrations from nearby drives as well as heat, I feel like there's more to it than that but can't say myself.

Do you mean that the drive will say it's dead if there are errors?

[–] FierroG@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

As far as I could find, both of the drives I'm considering are CMR, I guess for my purposes it doesn't matter that much since I'm not going to do too much writing beyond a regular drive, as I mentioned my main reasoning was reliability and always on operation.

I intellectually understand the thing about drives dying every few years and have accepted that fact, but I can't shake the feeling of that being wrong because I have other three regular hard drives with more than a decade of working fine.

 

I'm looking for help deciding, or maybe with info I haven't found on my own and or experience you have with these drives.

I'm finally pulling the trigger on a drive (more in the future, for now I still have a few smaller ones on my desktop for backup) specifically for use on my home server, so far I've been doing fine with my 2.5' hdd but besides running tight on space, I want a more reliable drive.

I've been researching and looking up options within my budget, payment methods and such and ended up with two options, both WD (the options I've found on seagate are a bit more expensive):

  • WD80EFPX WD red plus 8TB (in three different stores at similar enough prices, not sure if that's relevant here)
  • WD120EFGX WD red plus 12 TB, not too much more expensive Note that I've skipped 10 TB reds because I've read those have a couple problems like being abnormally noisy and unreliable

As far as I could find out, it seems this 12 TB option is a bit louder (I'm not sure if 30 vs 24 dB is too much, but idk really) and a bit slower data throughput (despite spinning the platters faster, or at least saying so in the specs), but I couldn't find anything about them being particularly unreliable (though I'm new to buying drives for reliability, unfortunately, timing-wise). I do want more storage (who doesn't?), but I'd rather focusing on reliability between these options.

While I don't exactly intend to run RAID, I ended up choosing nas drives for the 24/7 intended usage, I don't think it'll make much difference but I rather the peace of mind, my use is immich for photos (hence the reliability), jellyfin for a small selection of stuff (which doesn't require that much performance as far as I can tell) and a few small services that will mostly live on the ssd (and general NAS usage too, no need for much performance). Similarly big drives for regular use aren't that much cheaper anyways (between the options I have available and accounting for the reliability thing) but will still value your input on the topic, I'm still open to just looking for regular drives if it turns out I'm wrong about that.

Quick note on the topic of noise: I have my home server in the same space as my desktop and the noise of my desktop is already a bit much, It's fine but it's not far from being annoying, Can't hear anything from the server and hope it won't change much after the new drives (I'll focus on making my desktop quieter in the future).

Only other similarly dense (and priced) drives I've found are Seagate IronWolf ST8000VN004 8TB, Seagate Barracuda 8TB ST8000DM004 and then a bunch of surveilance drives which I've read again and again aren't worth getting for NAS or homelab usage.

Hope this is not too far from the topic of selfhosting since it's mostly about storage (for use in a home server).

As you can see, being succinct is not my specialty, sorry for the long post.

[–] FierroG@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I feel like I'm doing something wrong by just using smb, what fratures do everybody use and need from cloud storage other than a folder you and your apps can access? File sync aside (I don't think I need it and if I did I know how to use syncthing)

[–] FierroG@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I tried it but I get the following error

Cliparr could not open any playback stream. Preview stream failed: Cannot decode avc video in this browser. Cannot decode aac audio in this browser. Source stream failed: Cannot decode avc video in this browser. Cannot decode aac audio in this browser.

I'm honestly unsure of how to troubleshoot since I don't really get what the problem is, the browser works fine with jellyfin, tried a handful of videos and in both firefox and chromium. I'm not knowledgeable enough to solve it.

 

As the title says, for a brief time a while ago I modded valheim and found r2modman and felt it was one of if not the best experience I've had modding games, it was especially sweet because I could mod the game with my friend who's on windows and the process was the exact same so helping them was no issue.

I wanted to know what other similar software there is for modding on linux, since the game collection it works on is kinda limited (I only own a few of those) and whenever I want to mod a particular game I end up overwhelmed with steps and options.

To avoid just a list of every linux mod manager under the sun, most of the experience modding with r2modman is: picking a game > hitting download > play There's usually not much you have to do for a specific mod to work besides adding it to the list, and it keeps the game files squeaky clean.

[–] FierroG@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The only one of those that I've tried is cyberpunk, but besides being a really good and fun game for what you're looking for, I want to add that I found it easy to get off or back on, which you might want

[–] FierroG@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I recently switched to it because I wanted to finally have a good try at wayland with a distro made for it, and wow was I blown away, cachy is the closest I've ever been to a "it just works" OS (including every windows version I've used, from 98 up to 10), just a couple hardware specific issues that I have fixed (except for one). I also really like plasma, I'm mot committed to it but it was nice to come back to it after using mint for a while. I still wouldn't recommend it to a newcomer but damn, it's good.

[–] FierroG@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Are there dedicated desktop wireless headsets with noticeable latency? My shitty hyperx cloud flight have no noticeable latency and I even played around with some audio settings (on linux, windows audio drivers are very limited) and got it to the point where I could use them to monitor my usb mic in real time (which, for anyone who knows, is a very latency sensitive use case).

Afaik the latency thing is a problem with bluetooth.

[–] FierroG@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I Have a hyperx cloud flight (the first ones), very light, in arch based distros the range is pretty big (in mint and pop, for whatever reason, the range is abysmal), they work with no caveats on linux (though no battery report, there's a script or two floating on the internet to have it with no hassle). I'm sure there are better options these days (better battery and sound quality), but these are the ones I have experience with.

They're not my first choice in audio, but they did so much for me when I had my kid, you can drop in and out of your pc without needing to remove your headphones, they don't block much so you can even listen to the baby crying if you're at a low volume (or you can just have one ear out), you can hang out in calls while holding the bb, etc.

For any new parents out there, can't tell you how much they did for me, in particular the combination of

  • being for PC (no latency, being able to get in and out of your gaming sessions or whatever you do without even having to take them off)
  • having a decent quality microphone next to your mouth (you don't need to raise your voice and can be heard easily despite background noise, good signal to noise ratio)
  • not being that good at blocking sound, this is crucial when you can't compromise your full attention but can have most of it.
  • being light weight (I know there are some wireless headphones that are bulky and not that light).
[–] FierroG@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
  • A udev rule that won't work in my new distro (cachyos) for no apparent reason when it worked fine everywhere else

  • Obs using way too much cpu for no reason even in a clean setup at idle

  • Having to select what window will be captured to the obs canvas every time

  • Having to swap active audio outputs until volume stops being too low at every restart.

That's about all of it, I think.

32
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by FierroG@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

Before you scream at your screen, I am aware this setup isn't ideal, to say the least, my Self-hosting has been composed of a laptop with a usb carry with a 2.5 1tb hard drive. I recent made up my mind about getting a couple 4 tb server hdd (heard barracuda are relatively silent) to run software raid 1, since I can't find a budget double bay carry (that I can purchase locally) I've decided I'll get a couple 3.5 inch usb cases and get a splitter to run the power from just just one brick.

My question is regarding resiliency, I get occasional blackouts and low tension every now and then, a few times a year but it can be a few times in a day. I've never had hardware dying because of it and I don't have a UPS, but I worry I could be risking data corruption or something swapping to this setup because of the extra power those drives will need being fed from the wall instead of the laptop (the laptop feeds the current drive over usb alone and it has a battery) which could be abruptly cut off every now and then. Right now, the worst this has caused has been having to reboot the system because it got unmounted but never had a loss of data from this.

Am I worrying for nothing? Would it be just the same? Should I just put this off until (if) I can afford the drives plus a ups? So far I've had my server for basically free, but I'm running out of space for family photos and I kinda have to upgrade.

Edit: Thanks a lot for all the thoughtful responses! What I've learnt from them so far:

  • ZFS (what's used for software RAID) takes some extra memory and might not be the best idea for a memory constrained system.
  • In this case of mirrored drives, it's better to schedule backups than to try a flimsy raid array usb abomination, didn't even think of that as an option
  • Sudden power loss is likely to corrupt files
  • Following the previous item, a UPS is more important than I thought, my laptop's battery probably saved me from more corruption than I was aware of. I might have to prioritize that over the expansion.

Learned a lot so far, thank you all so much!

view more: next ›