GregorGizeh

joined 1 year ago
[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That’s simply unrealistic to implement right away though. The best realistic system I could see would be the Swiss system except online.

There the citizens vote on all major decisions, requiring politicians to either take on issues of importance to the people or to make their policies palatable to the general population if they hope for it to pass.

This seems like a reasonable middle ground to ensure that citizens stay informed and engaged - at least on big issues - and that their leaders are generally required to consider the wishes of the people.

I could see monthly or bimonthly digital voting on a handful of current issues work out well, provided they are presented in a digestible format to the average citizen.

If people have to do hours of research to even understand what the question is they will very likely just vote whatever or ask their friends what they voted. Worst case even sell their votes on issues they don’t care about.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The problem with that is that the average citizen cannot possibly keep up with and stay informed on all issues that the government makes decisions on, and for the most part they don’t want to have to either.

That is why representative systems were created in the first place, so the average person would not have to bother with politics and instead would vote for someone they trust to represent their interests for a while.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I generally agree, but as long as there is no safe way to prevent malware spam posts (of which I reported plenty whenever I encountered them) I find it a minefield that is uncomfortable to navigate when I just want to browse some content lying in bed.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (15 children)

But the speed doesn’t really matter, so it shouldn’t be very energy intensive at all. Just gather up some junk, launch it at the sun with an expendable thruster, and be done with it. If it travels at a couple hundred kph, or even less is completely irrelevant. Let it take a couple hundred years to get there, it is supposed to burn up anyway no? And if it collides or is otherwise destroyed en route during that time won’t matter much either.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Tankies are so fucking weird to me, and I would consider myself a progressive socialist as well.

How can they so unapologetically support Russia and China, when both nations are objectively not socialist in any sense of the word.

China does state capitalism, just because they have a one party state installed by the communist party doesn’t automatically mean they still are. All that is left is intense authoritarianism, with dystopian ambitions on global hegemony.

Russia is a failed state in the grasp of a kleptocratic oligarchy, with an extreme degree of corruption and disturbing moral decay in all levels of society. The only thing communist about it today is the old soviet ordnance they make their conscripts die in at the ukranian front.

Modern China and Russia are antithetical to actual leftist ideals, and any tankie supporting them just screams misinformed idiot or foreign propaganda shill and should be dismissed by default.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

One thing I dislike about Lemmy so far is the amount of highly suspicious links no one has ever heard of, that are constantly being shared. Makes me as a user really paranoid to touch any links before examining the url closely, which is good practice I guess, but makes the whole content browsing process a bit stressful.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t know much about it myself, but I would guess it is negligible. Maybe for small propeller machines with a fairly limited amount of fuel capacity; but larger planes, especially commercial ones, have reserve fuel for quite some time.

Situations where landing at the destination is temporarily unavailable, air traffic requires the plane to circle for some time, or they are even rerouted to a different airport can always occur and are accounted for. A minor increase from rainfall shouldn’t make a dent. I would think.

21
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by GregorGizeh@lemmy.world to c/voyagerapp@lemmy.world
 

First of all, thanks for a great app that I have been using ever since I joined Lemmy, it made the whole transition from that other place much easier.

With the recent addition of gesture configuration I was wondering if you would add two very important functions I found missing: back and forward. While there is the option to do the left edge swipe to go back I find it imprecise to execute (I often scroll up or down instead) and uncomfortable to reach for my thumb (I am left handed and use the phone primarily with that hand).

Back when I used Apollo I had the short left and right swipes set to go back and forward and it made the browsing experience much more comfortable for me, I could execute the gestures from the screen center very easily.

Thanks for the read and consideration

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Normal games just use any actual name they like and put a disclaimer that any similarities to existing people are unintentional

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I just yesterday saw a post how disabling downvotes for an instance that still acts as part of the greater fediverse causes issues and unfair advantages with posts being created there that can achieve a high score very easily, even on accident.

I would expect Lemmy to rework that function to avoid these issues so that up- and downvotes are either mandatory or can only be disabled together. I would not recommend trying to find an instance based on if they practice this most likely not here to stay functionality.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Holy shit those names are fantastic.

Dwigt Rortugal must be my favorite. Mike Truk

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

I think there is also the molars and general jaw shape to consider. Carnivores are not just identified by their fangs, they have generally a different structure and layout of their jaws that is made to lock into a prey animal or tear out pieces of flesh.

In contrast, many herbivores have teeth laid out to grind down plant matter (think cows or goats) and their mouths are laid out to chew off vegetation with very articulated lips to assist. Even if these camels have pointy fangs, the rest of their mouth would indicate they eat primarily plants.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While I agree that certain state sponsored actors and private interest groups are most definitely involved in discourse manipulation on reddit, Lemmy simply isn’t big enough for this yet.

If we go by the numbers stated in the original post, the whole of Lemmy has less than 500k users at this point, whom are overwhelmingly <40 years old tech affine early adopter nerds from the United States and Western Europe.

Too insignificant to spend resources on, and also largely sceptical of corporate interests and authoritarian governments (except the tankies of course); so by default critical of the two top potential manipulators.

 

Title. I like engaging with Trek content, but i haven’t watched most of the new content and would like to avoid spoilers, which seems difficult especially regarding SNW when subscribed here. Feels like there is half a dozen posts about it every day.

Is there a place for old Trek discussion or content, or alternatively a spoiler free one?

view more: next ›