Hobbes

joined 1 year ago
[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The thing is she wasn't sad to have to do it. She said she "hated" the puppy.

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 7 points 7 months ago

This will hopefully be the dumbest thing I read today. But I assume this is a troll or a PR person.

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This man should have been president. Fuck Hillary and the DNC.

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 33 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yep, both sides sure are the same.

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm lazy as fuck.

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't sound like it was a trump supporter unfortunately.

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 6 points 7 months ago

It was. Really bad movie but fun.

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 12 points 7 months ago

Not a shower thought

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's not nearly enough.

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 7 points 7 months ago

He needs this for his brownshirts.

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 5 points 7 months ago

This week the House is set to vote on legislation to renew Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA 702”), along with a set of amendments. One of these amendments — put forward by House Intelligence Committee leads Mike Turner and Jim Himes — would expand warrantless FISA surveillance dramatically: While falsely billing itself as a minor definitional tweak, in reality the amendment would be the largest expansion of FISA since Section 702 was created in 2008. It could be used to enlist an array of sensitive facilities — such as offices for nonprofits, political campaigns, and news organizations — to serve as hubs for warrantless surveillance.

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I am unable to glean any information from that title.

view more: ‹ prev next ›