Nah, downvoted because it doesn't spark healthy discussion.

"What about freedom of speech?" isn't a valid question because the article is about social media, not a government. There are no freedom of speech rights on social media platforms.

Here is the paper:

https://jabde.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/TiffanyWormLoveAritlce.pdf

Wine Bottles: Unless you break me on a bow of a ship on its first launch, then it's good luck.

Better. I'd rather work with reality than endlessly chase fantasies which I'll never reach.

depending on the context

This is exactly why these trolley problems don't work. When we strip away all context and ask simplified questions the nuance disappears and the question becomes almost meaningless.

They didn't actually have performance indicators, nor any poor performance data. When she asked for their evidence, they said they could get it later. In my head that translates to "We don't actually have the data."

"We can talk about that later."

"We can't go into specifics at the moment."

"This isn't the form, or the situation where we can go into detail."

I love her response:

"But then when? If it's not right when I'm getting fired then it's certainly not going to be after when I'm no longer part of the company."

I was out of the loop on this one.

https://www.learnreligions.com/dia-de-los-santos-inocentes-day-of-the-holy-innocents-3083261

You think your 7s are distinct from your ones.

I know that my 7s are distinct from my ones.

We are not the same.

Also science way back: "Hey guys, isn't phlogiston just the absolute best? And lobotomies are so cool they deserve a Nobel prize."

This makes me sad to be a human being.

Look for the helpers.

You haven't heard of "Dude" and "Trust me, bro"? They're incredibly popular research companies.