My thoughts exactly, but they also suck up more than the commons, according to our intellectual property laws. I was glad when the courts decided that LLM products were not copyright-able works. A commons for the models also means much less redundant training infrastructure, i.e. fewer data centers, and ability to reign in market externalities, like burning fossil fuels to power them.
JangleJack
joined 11 months ago
"protection"
Huh, I wonder why GOP senators and henchmen will not abandon Trump? Oh wait, he ran a massive blackmail operation for decades with his buddy Jeff.
Separated at birth?
This was an episode of Blacklist IRL?
If they block the bike lanes in DC, they are in for a rude awakening. At least it's not a bot.
I had a mild case about five years ago and did self-guided gradual exposure therapy. (I do not react outside of bowel cramps.) That worked for me in about 2 months, but I think that approach would be high risk for anyone with severe reactions. I have it again as of three weeks ago.
This cover has a strong omage to the Second Foundation cover, by Michael Whelan.
... until Israel honors the ceasefire in Lebanon and Gaza. Many headlines omit the stated reason for halted talks.
I like KeePassXC and SyncThing for my own use. I am not sure that I am ready to apply a no-llm purity test if a dev is using a model appropriately. If the code becomes obfuscated somehow, that would be another matter. In the longer term I hope FOSS devs do not come to rely on paid cloud models or favor code quantity over quality.
view more: next ›
House of Saud y'all. MBS. But like, enjoy yer e-sports.