Jiggle_Physics

They either fail to realize that the avatar is to maintain anonymity, while giving people a personable figure to watch, or they are just one of those people who don't like it due to personal preferences, and want to sound like they have a better reason than that.

Points out where working with me give no security guarantees, that they accept when agreeing to allow me to hack them, either in person, writing, or electronic communications, along with allowing the terms to change at any time, for any reason, without notice.

According to a lot of people? No.

I mean, it is just sponge cake, from what I have looked at people generally didn't just eat them this plain. They added sesame seeds/oil, dip them into tea, add various types of creams, honey, etc.

maybe crab cakes?

looks good

From the thumb nail it looked like someone holing a tiny little cupcake

If by stunt you mean, "discusses how the character has been set-up as the natural replacement with games media interviewer"... then sure, stunt.

Heh, It wasn't world, I bailed there when I saw they banned others for telling people to jury nullify luigi's case. It was on an account I mostly use for NSFW content, which was not the account I expected to get a ban for political speech.

Cool, I know being a mod sucks, used to do it when I was younger. Just, have had my comments that corpos, having spent decades, and billions, destroying any civil means of change, will mean they will suffer violence for it, get me banned on an instance.

I know from experience some mods don't see the difference. Which is why I asked.

Would discussion of the break down of the efficacy of civil venues for change, leading to this kind of violence, as an outcome of their own actions, be acceptable?

Jigs up boys! Fly! Fly!