A good resource, but it’s indicating that it’s a probable carcinogen, not a known carcinogen. That means that evidence is limited and it’s in the same category as red meat.
Jkosmonaut
joined 3 years ago
In the spirit of the comment we’re replying to - what direct evidence is there? I’ve mostly seen studies providing dubious or weak links between realistic dosages of Glyphosate and any animal harm. I legitimately want to learn more if I’m mistaken.
That episode of JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure makes a lot more sense now
I definitely read the last word as “shitting.”
As an aside, this person is really good at drawing hands.
Saikat Chakrabarti, AOC’s former campaign manager, is actually running against Pelosi and not just launching an exploratory bid. https://www.saikat.us/en
👁️👄👁️
His name is Linus Tech Tips
There are several! Instead of funding one large, expensive NASA mission, they took the unusual approach of funding many small and new companies a relatively small amount of money to develop their technology and attempt a landing with some NASA payloads under the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program.
The idea is that they know some are going to fail, especially their first attempt. The NASA administrator in charge of the program has described the strategy as “shots on goal.” These are basically startups with untested technology using “cheap” stuff instead of traditional aerospace materials because that’s all they could afford. But the payoff could be huge if they do actually succeed and they’re getting closer and closer to that! Here’s a rough schedule:
https://www.planetary.org/space-missions/clps
So yes, these are all private companies that received NASA funding to help develop their landers, but the funding was small for a mission of this scale and most the companies bid at a loss in order to win their missions.
Yiga clan restocking their base.
view more: next ›
x69 only.