Kelly

joined 1 week ago
[–] Kelly@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

Interesting to see the doom recreation. The commentary in the subtitles is fascinating.

11
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Kelly@programming.dev to c/godot@programming.dev
[–] Kelly@programming.dev 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

MPL is a weak copyleft license.

If they make changes to your files then they have to share their changes to those files with a reciprocal license.

It has no impact on the licencing of the rest of their project.

[–] Kelly@programming.dev 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I understand proprietary licenses and the business models they support, I also understand open source licenses and the business models they support.

If they they published paid binaries and free source code I would support them (morally), or if they published free binaries and free source code and ran a patreon I would support them (morally).

But to fork GPL code and hold the derived source ransom? Not cool.