Not even labeled as an ad/sponsored content/influenced "tip"/suggestion.
Yes, that's what it means.
And apparently, it happened selectively, not generally, but for specific people/request sources.
It would only be if you use the Notepad++'s own update mechanism. If you used other package managers or went and downloaded the installer to update you'd be fine.
His comments came as cURL users complained that the move was treating the symptoms caused by AI slop without addressing the cause. The users said they were concerned the move would eliminate a key means for ensuring and maintaining the security of the tool.
A single user commented, and they responded. “users complained” and "the users" is wrong. implying something different.
“users complained” feels like a misrepresentation to me as well, at least how I read and understand "complained". The user wrote “As a security researcher, this is honestly painful to see, but also completely understandable.” Is it complaining if they understand the act and change?
In a separate post on Thursday, Stenberg wrote: “We will ban you and ridicule you in public if you waste our time on crap reports.”
The linked separate post is a /.well-known/security.txt file. It's not really a “separate post”. And I don't see where they got the date from. Maybe from whatever linked to that in the first place.
An update to cURL’s official GitHub account made the termination, which takes effect at the end of this month, official.
Isn't that from the merge request, which is not merged yet? It's definitely not in the main branch. Current MR state is something different. The MR discussion clearly states that they will merge on 26th - no early.
“an update to the official GitHub account” makes no sense to me in the first place, when it's a file in a repo, not even the account.
At first, I only wanted to point out one thing. Now this whole article feels like AI slop. Dunno how warranted that feeling/assessment is. Is it sloppy reporting? Am I, as a reader, the problem?
/edit: The bleeping computer article posted in the community is much better/consistent/coherent. Of course, this one was earlier and already has traction.
A relatively uncommon but reasonable, good approach to issue management.
Discussions allow for different formats, including explicit voting, which is useful for things like feature requests.
The issue, presumably the PR (linked at the top of the issue because of reference).
Look at the code change. It gets inputs and loops over them and seems to do an in-place fixup. But the code indent is wrong, and it even changed the function definition of the unrelated next function. In Python, the indent-logic-significance language.
I assume they briefly showed the code on stage. Even then it should have been obvious to any developer. py file, messy indent, changes unrelated function.
Please correct me if this is the wrong PR.
If you don't care too much and don't have experience yet, why not go for native browser and HTML/CSS/JavaScript?
Even if you eventually migrate to other web UI libs and frameworks, the foundations knowledge will be useful.
Yep, completely dishonest corporate double-speak - and not just in the word “excited”.
ROCm is an implementation/superset of OpenCL.
ROCm ships its installable client driver (ICD) loader and an OpenCL implementation bundled together. As of January 2022, ROCm 4.5.2 ships OpenCL 2.2
Shaders are computational visual [post-]processing - think pixel position based adjustments to rendering.
OpenCL and CUDA are computation frameworks where you can use the GPU for other processing than rendering. You can use it for more general computing.
nVidia has always been focusing on proprietary technology. Introduce a technology, and try to make it a closed market, where people are forced to buy and use nVidia for it. AMD has always been supporting and developing open standards as a counterplay to that.
Feature World Lighting: not implemented
Lighting is server side? o.O
I guess because it influences creep spawn or sth?
I'm just glad we didn't end up with this one (seen in the ticket)
Has features ✅
That's it, all possible questions have been asked! /s
99% is a crazy number for a drop. I guess if you're big enough can can still survive and 1% is still significant. The trajectory is pretty clear and worrying [for them], though.
/edit:
That's… very few. 50 a day. Two per hour. For a platform [that was] as big as Stack Overflow.